tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post7087100021912931612..comments2024-03-18T20:22:06.331-04:00Comments on GROGNARDIA: OSRIC is MineJames Maliszewskihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-82490738229242619632009-07-01T18:22:29.985-04:002009-07-01T18:22:29.985-04:00Just to say I've had a great time playing OSRI...Just to say I've had a great time playing OSRIC in a couple of online games. It has lovely clear presentation and a great interpretation of the AD&D rules. I prefer to run Labyrinth Lord (starting at 3rd level & max hp) but OSRIC's more powerful PCs make it more suitable for starting a game at 1st level - eg in an OSRIC/1e game with PCs starting at max hp, my 1st level Ranger has 18 hp; STR 18/5X and x2 weapon specialised with twin hand axes he's git something like THAC0 15 and 2.5 attacks per round for 1d6+6 damage each. A 1st level STR 18 LL Fighter would have THAC0 16 and 1 attack for 1d8+3 with a sword. Plus STR 18 is unlikely in LL.Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01173759805310975320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-4588791420323711992009-07-01T16:04:26.295-04:002009-07-01T16:04:26.295-04:00I also wanted to give a shout out to the OSRIC cov...I also wanted to give a shout out to the OSRIC cover. To me, it captures a great AD&D feel.Terrexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06326372724518590612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-28671603429132121582009-07-01T15:56:28.471-04:002009-07-01T15:56:28.471-04:00I think there's been a lot more support and pr...I think there's been a lot more support and product for OSRIC than many may be aware of. To date, no less than 7 distinct publishers have produced a total of 27 adventure modules explicitly branded OSRIC. This includes the ten XRP modules actually available at many FLGS. For a complete OSRIC adventure catalog see here: <br /> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSRIC-Compatible_Adventure_Modules<br /><br />Additionally, 7 publishers have produced a total of 14 OSRIC supplements, including the fine Monsters of Myth:<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSRIC-Compatible_Supplements<br /><br />It's very vogue, I think, to talk about OD&D on the blogs and forums right now and that's fine. But, AD&D is the game many of us PLAY. I think OSRIC is playing an important role in preserving AD&D.Terrexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06326372724518590612noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-91756304180296394022009-07-01T09:56:14.651-04:002009-07-01T09:56:14.651-04:00I still haven't gotten around to getting my co...I still haven't gotten around to getting my copy. The PDF version is nice, but you're right; there's nothing like holding a print version. I will say I had a lot of fun doing some of the artwork in there.Xyanthonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07902260753434100101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-45493002558613921842009-07-01T09:24:23.015-04:002009-07-01T09:24:23.015-04:00Heck, even Expeditious Retreat Press's Malevol...<i>Heck, even Expeditious Retreat Press's Malevolent and Benign, which is explicitly sold as "a first edition bestiary," isn't an OSRIC product, which strikes me as very odd.</i><br /><br />I'll explain then. :)<br /><br />Malevolent and Benign isn't listed as an OSRIC product because we're testing to see if a lack of OSRIC branding for a 1e product affects sales.<br /><br />So, it's nothing more than a market information gathering choice and isn't representative of any type of switch of support of OSRIC. Our Advanced Adventures line will continue to be OSRIC-branded. In fact, we've got 3 more in the pipeline right now.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12922167436453058962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-52182513276170085572009-07-01T09:23:56.868-04:002009-07-01T09:23:56.868-04:00Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Basic ...<i>Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Basic Fantasy RPG made before OSRIC?</i><br /><br>I believe it was, but, by most current understandings of the term, <i>Basic Fantasy</i> isn't considered a retro-clone but more its own thing.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-19709529945813971772009-07-01T09:19:51.058-04:002009-07-01T09:19:51.058-04:00The OSRIC™ Open License is a major deterrent to us...<i>The OSRIC™ Open License is a major deterrent to using OSRIC in serious publishing. Section 5 in particular is a mess.</i><br /><br>When you compare it to the S&W Compatibility License, for example, it's definitely not a positive thing. And I think that's a terrible shame, because there really does need to be an AD&D clone out there and OSRIC is simply glorious. I can only assume that the state of the OSRIC OGC and Open License have something to do with the vague rumors I'd heard of WotC's legal department sniffing around the project, but that's just a gut feeling based on nothing substantial, so I may be completely off base here.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-32083427490104812462009-07-01T09:16:22.060-04:002009-07-01T09:16:22.060-04:00Incidentally I wrote all the potions, scrolls, rod...<i>Incidentally I wrote all the potions, scrolls, rods, staves, and wands (and a few monsters), so if anyone wants/needs to use those I'm planning to put them out as OGC independently. Just drop me a line.</i><br /><br>That's awesome. Thanks for doing that.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-44841489898454701182009-07-01T09:15:17.525-04:002009-07-01T09:15:17.525-04:00James, you may recall I fought this OGC battle a y...<i>James, you may recall I fought this OGC battle a year ago, which is the only reason some of OSRIC is currently OGC. It got a little messy. I'm grateful that some of it is OGC, but IMHO the rest should be if for no other reason than ethics.</i><br /><br>As you know, I fully agree with you on this score.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-80383128629235010702009-07-01T08:42:22.824-04:002009-07-01T08:42:22.824-04:00Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Basic ...Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Basic Fantasy RPG made before OSRIC?Jonathanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04048720409823684300noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-59056994801388987582009-07-01T05:21:02.848-04:002009-07-01T05:21:02.848-04:00The entirety of OSRIC is not OGC under the OGL. Th...<i>The entirety of OSRIC is not OGC under the OGL. Three large chapters are designed as Product Identity. While that's still fairly generous by many measures, it's a fair bit less than either S&W or LL have done.</i><br /><br />Right, I see. As it stands, it is legally harder to claim to be OSRIC compatible than AD&D compatible. Identifying a product as "OSRIC compatible" supposedly binds the publisher to complying with the WotC OGL which includes the dreaded section 7 of that license which, IMO, is a legal minefield. It also restricts what 1e monsters one can use, of course.<br /><br />If you want to do 1e material, it seems to me that you'd be better off not mentioning OSRIC or the OGL anywhere.Nagorahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04934827653905274555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-48360655526707004992009-07-01T03:43:28.985-04:002009-07-01T03:43:28.985-04:00I would have thought the book would be on the '...I would have thought the book would be on the 'want' list of most 1e players/gms because as well as combining the PHB, DMG and MM into one handy volume, the book is so much better organised and easier to reference with a comprehensive index, table of contents and lists of monsters, treasure and spells. For the exact same reasons I would also think this is the book DMs should give new players of AD&D. <br /><br />As for the cover art...it's not my favourite piece. But there is a lot of great art inside...including some by the awesome Peter Mullen. In fact, they should have put the Mullen back cover art on the front because it is one of the most evocative pictures of dungeon exploration I've seen!Mallius Vanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11017597212038657943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-75876729487069870612009-07-01T03:37:09.634-04:002009-07-01T03:37:09.634-04:00The OSRIC™ Open License is a major deterrent to us...The OSRIC™ Open License is a major deterrent to using OSRIC in serious publishing. Section 5 in particular is a mess.Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05138730966226244399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-34943414773403701802009-06-30T23:54:04.779-04:002009-06-30T23:54:04.779-04:00Akrasia, as for #1, yes, because 1) The OSRIC lice...Akrasia, as for #1, yes, because 1) The OSRIC license requires that the OGL is used in order to use the OSRIC license and 2) If you use the OGL, the OGL forbids indicating compatibility with a trademark or product identity (as defined in the OGL) without explicit permission.Dan of Earthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04957424338566461756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-83856407327995467302009-06-30T22:32:37.753-04:002009-06-30T22:32:37.753-04:00Akrasia, I can only speak to #2. After 30 some-odd...Akrasia, I can only speak to #2. After 30 some-odd years, I've either puzzled it out through repeated readings, ignore it, or made up my own system (initiative is a great example of the latter). But that's just me...Josephhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01355324231111953098noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-16770794917985311692009-06-30T22:03:59.900-04:002009-06-30T22:03:59.900-04:00Three quick questions/comments.
1. Is there anyth...Three quick questions/comments.<br /><br />1. Is there anything preventing a publisher from using OSRIC <i>and</i> explicitly indicating compatibility with 1e AD&D?<br /><br />2. Even if one owns the original AD&D books, some of the rules are more clearly explained in OSRIC (viz. initiative).<br /><br />3. It's a pity that the Pete Mullen picture (on page xiv) wasn't used for the cover!Akrasiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08734103159691571156noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-87616819402400004072009-06-30T21:28:44.299-04:002009-06-30T21:28:44.299-04:00All the magic items and monsters, among other thin...All the magic items and monsters, among other things, but those two areas especially should IMHO be OGC. Incidentally I wrote all the potions, scrolls, rods, staves, and wands (and a few monsters), so if anyone wants/needs to use those I'm planning to put them out as OGC independently. Just drop me a line.Dan of Earthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04957424338566461756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-51380592637657164182009-06-30T21:23:29.052-04:002009-06-30T21:23:29.052-04:00I'm curious, what's in the non-OGL chapter...I'm curious, what's in the non-OGL chapters? Is it material that's critical to the game?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-69635112603538260202009-06-30T21:19:24.278-04:002009-06-30T21:19:24.278-04:00James, you may recall I fought this OGC battle a y...James, you may recall I fought this OGC battle a year ago, which is the only reason some of OSRIC is currently OGC. It got a little messy. I'm grateful that some of it is OGC, but IMHO the rest should be if for no other reason than ethics.Dan of Earthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04957424338566461756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-51483780663872822062009-06-30T20:55:05.115-04:002009-06-30T20:55:05.115-04:00Cool!
I am glad you got it. I enjoyed the book, ...Cool!<br /><br />I am glad you got it. I enjoyed the book, but was up by you and figured you would enjoy it more.<br /><br />It is odd that it is not 100% open. Especially since the idea seems to be to use it to produce AD&D 1st ed like compatible products.<br /><br />I hope you like it!Timothy S. Brannanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02923526503305233715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-71554545265987339912009-06-30T20:21:58.767-04:002009-06-30T20:21:58.767-04:00@James: Thanks. I concur with the Methuselah clau...@James: Thanks. I concur with the Methuselah clause. :)Timeshadowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09952601433965644275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-74443984275904600052009-06-30T20:12:18.504-04:002009-06-30T20:12:18.504-04:00I've got to say, as someone who owns all of th...I've got to say, as someone who owns all of the retro-clones (I think!) in hard-copy, the reason I don't actually use any of them is because I still have my original 1E books. <br /><br />I simply don't *need* the clones, since I have the original. And I must say my local FLGS has a stack of them for very reasonable prices, and they regularly show up at the local used book store as well. <br /><br />So why do I buy the clones? Partly, as a show of support for the OSR. The folks behind them have put in a lot of work, and I do feel a certain level of "helping out the family". I'm something of a collector when it comes to such things, and I likes my collections complete. Too, each of them has their own unique take on the elder games, and it's interesting to see how that is expressed in the rules, even if I don't end up using them in my own game.<br /><br />As far as why the companies haven't gotten on the OSRIC bandwagon when it comes to releasing 1E-related material, it might be as simple as "we don't need to". A simple statement of compatibility isn't a violation of trademark or copyright, and if they're vague (and clever) enough in regards to mechanics, they probably don't need to avail themselves of the license. I hadn't picked up on the fact that the whole book isn't OGC. Maybe that has something to do with it, too.Josephhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01355324231111953098noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-71016951056851822472009-06-30T20:00:48.400-04:002009-06-30T20:00:48.400-04:00I'll admit I'm not all that fond of the co...I'll admit I'm not all that fond of the cover, but the interior art is very nice -- in some cases quite extraordinary.<br /><br />I agree, as I think many of the people behind OSRIC would, that most AD&Ders are quite content simply to use their old books. OSRIC isn't really for them so much as for publishers looking to support 1e legally, thus making my own interests in a more broadly open game less of a concern. That's a fair point, but, one day, those AD&D books will be less readily available and it's when that happens that something like OSRIC needs to move beyond being a "publisher's resource" to being a game in its own right.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-68810459531131494192009-06-30T19:55:59.968-04:002009-06-30T19:55:59.968-04:00@James, is the interior artwork better than the co...@James, is the interior artwork better than the cover?<br /><br />---<br />My sensibilities reflect that of Eli Elder's statement as regards the lack of support.<br /><br />If Dragonsfoot is any indication, most original 1e players either never stopped playing 1e, or retained/secured copies of the rules and simply use them 'instead.'Timeshadowshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09952601433965644275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7487871339000666216.post-3354023256222886052009-06-30T18:38:55.259-04:002009-06-30T18:38:55.259-04:00I'm not sure what James means about it not bei...<i>I'm not sure what James means about it not being open, though. What's the problem with it being the way it is?</i><br /><br>The entirety of OSRIC is not OGC under the OGL. Three large chapters are designed as Product Identity. While that's still fairly generous by many measures, it's a fair bit less than either S&W or LL have done.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.com