Friday, August 16, 2024

Level Titles: Clerics and Magic-Users

Yesterday, we looked at the level titles of fighters and thieves, so today we'll turn to the level titles of clerics and magic-users. These are a bit more interesting, in that there's more variability between the different editions of Dungeons & Dragons. In OD&D (1974), clerics have the following level titles:

In the AD&D Players Handbook (1978), we get a similar but not identical list. Levels 1 and 2 are the same, while level 3 is simply "priest" rather than "village priest." The title of "curate" becomes a level 4 title and "vicar" disappears entirely, replaced by "perfect," which may or may not be a misspelling of "prefect." "Bishop" is replaced with "canon" and there's a title above patriarch – high priest.

The 1981 Expert Rules has yet another set of level titles, one that is fairly close to that of OD&D and yet still distinct. There's a new title, elder, that's placed in between curate and bishop, making the latter a 7th-level title rather than a 6th-level one in OD&D.

The strangest thing about all the lists of clerical level titles is how, for the most part, they're all derived from the names of Christian clergy, which says a lot about the origins of the cleric class. The anomalous titles are "adept," which strikes me as being more appropriate to a magic-user of some kind and "lama," which, while religious in character, has nothing to do with Christianity. Why these were both included in the list, I have no idea.

Turning to magic-users, we get this list in OD&D:

AD&D has a similar list, starting at level 3. The first two AD&D level titles are quite different and the titles that were replaced appear nowhere else on the list. They're simply removed. 

The Expert Rules give us yet another list. "Medium" and "seer" are restored to level 1 and 2, while "theurgist" and "thaumaturgist" are both removed entirely, much as "medium" and "seer" were in AD&D. The OD&D level titles that followed, starting with "magician" simply drop down several levels, perhaps so that "wizard" can now be the 9th-level rather than 11th-level title, since the 1981 edition places a great emphasis on level 9 being "name" level for the four human classes. Also of note is that the 1981 rules spell "conjurer" and "sorcerer" as "conjuror" and "sorceror," despite neither OD&D nor AD&D spelling them that way.

Normally, the 1983 Frank Mentzer-edited edition of D&D follows its 1981 predecessor quite closely, but there are some differences worthy of note. In the case of magic-user level titles, it's worth noting that '83 restores the "–er" endings of both "conjurer" and "sorcerer," while everything else remains the same.

I find these changes quite fascinating, but I wish I knew precisely why they were made. I have theories but no proof and I suspect, even if I were to hunt down the people responsible for doing so, they would not remember after so many decades. 

28 comments:

  1. I was never a D&D player, until recent dabbling with 4th Ed. (which has no level titles, IIUC?), so this is kind of coming from a position of blank ignorance, but ... were these popular with D&D players? As chrome, as color, as something people used in-game as titles for their characters as they progressed? Honestly, looking at these lists and the ones in the previous posts, they sound like a bit of a thesaurus mish-mash with only a few hints at hierarchy or ranking. But I can also see how that doesn't need to actually matter, in practice :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not in my experience, no. They were rarely if ever used by players in games I played or watched, and only a few GMs would use them for NPC titles, usually as an indicator of how powerful they might be. Even then it was more common for there to be something else that served the same purpose, like an order of wizards who always wore a number of silver stars on a belt or bracelet based on their rank. Woe betide anyone who didn't give some twelve-star bigwig the respect they thought they were due. Made it easy to disguise oneself as a member of the order too, but you didn't want to get caught at it.

      There was also a properly Vancian game I recall that used multi-tiered hats to mark your personal status, with anyone who tried to were a three-tier hat when they were clearly some two-tier pretender snubbed and castigated by their betters at every turn. Definitely introduced a certain comedy of manners into the game. D&D could use more petty snobbery.

      Delete
  2. In my copy of the AD&D Players Handbook, the fifth level title is missing entirely from CLERICS TABLE I. I pencilled in 'Vicar' at some point - I suppose it makes more sense as a senior title to 'Curate' than in the OD&D/Expert progression, which gets the hierarchy backwards. In the table above 'Perfect' also looks like it was added in at a later point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The addition of "perfect" is by me. Some printings of the 1978 PHB lack a title there. I looked at my earlier printing and saw what the title was there and then added it into the image, which came from a later printing PDF version.

      Delete
  3. The term "prefect" in religious terms comes from the Roman Catholic tradition. It's similar to being a regional governor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or it could be 'Perfect,' as in a Cathar religious guide or healer.

      Either would work, really.

      Delete
    2. If that's what's intended, then they had still dropped the ball by forgetting to include Pluperfect!

      Delete
  4. These are interesting! We never used the level tables... I had to pull my old PHB from my childhood out and sure enough, there was no title listed for a 5th level cleric... But now I know why and that is perfect indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I used the titles on occasion, mainly to denote importance/level of a NPC. And I love when an old module would reference NPCs by their titles (even better if it was just a title..The Curate). But otherwise I don't recall players using them terribly often if at all. Which is kind of sad, because as I've grown older I really like the idea of level titles used as in-game fiction. In fact, I think it would be fun to run a game and completely replace all references to class names and numerical level with a title instead.

    "Who is your character?"

    "Rurik the Veteran" ( Not " Rurik ..he's a level 1 Fighter."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wasn't Rurik last seen in New Pavis :-)

      Delete
    2. Poor fellow! So many of his peers made it into Old Pavis before disappearing from mortal knowledge :)

      Delete
    3. Yep, he's THE iconic character name that has stuck with me all.these years. He shows up in every fantasy game I run, RQ/OQ or otherwise. 3.0 D&D used his name as well for an iconic character homage.Tweet is a huge Glorantha fan.

      Delete
  6. You forgot to mention that AD&D also calls 16th level magic-users Mages and 18th level Arch-Mages! (But 17th level magic-users are still just Wizard 17th Level, apparently.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. *Chuckles* So cute that they constantly get Curate & Vicar the wrong way round Vicar is above Curate in CofE and RC

    ReplyDelete
  8. Don't forget the level titles of anti-clerics as given on page 35 of Men & Magic:
    1st: Evil Acolyte
    2nd: Evil Adept
    3rd: Shaman
    4th: Evil Priest
    5th: Evil Curate
    6th: Evil Bishop
    7th: Evil Lama
    8th and higher: Evil High Priest (often abbreviated as E.H.P.)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Of all the level titles, the inclusion of "Necromancer" on the Magic-Users list always bothered me because the word denotes a particular kind of magical practice, as opposed to merely being yet another synonym grabbed from the the thesaurus.

    If any of the other level names on the Magic-User list or any other class list has similar specificity, it escaped my notice (though one might suggest a "Prestidigitator" is specifically a sleight-of-hand artist). I suppose "Swordmaster" referring to competence with that specific family of weapons might be an annoyance to 3rd-level Fighters who'd rather be known for their expertise with any of the many polearms detailed in the PHB. ("Don't ever call me that again! I'm a Pikeman from a family of Pikemen!")

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To me, a "medium", a "seer" and a "conjurer" are also performing different kinds of magical service, at least.

      Delete
    2. This isn't necessarily the case. Yes, it does come from an Ancient Greek word that refers to divination via speaking with the dead, but by the time it had passed out of Late Latin into Old French, the Greek "nekro" (dead) root had been conflated with the Latinate "nigro" (black), so that in Old or Middle French, the word could be "necromauncie" or "nigromauncie," implying that it was just a generic term for "black magic." In other words, in a medieval idiom, a necromancer is just an arcane spellcaster.

      (And it's further worth noting that magic-users who control undead puppets aren't exactly a common thing to find in European folklore. You have witches who make zombis in African folklore, sure, but in medieval Europe? Apart from the odd ghost, revenant, or vampire, undead are already kind of sparse; and corporeal undead who serve a wizard are basically a foreign concept.)

      Delete
  10. James, I'm hoping you'll have something to say about Tekumel "level titles" in this context as well!

    That's where I encountered the concept, and I liked 'em, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hadn't considered it, but perhaps I should reconsider.

      Delete
  11. As with your previous examinations of these level-titles, it's interesting that so many of the additional classes and sub-classes of later editions used these very same titles to differentiate *kind* instead of *degree*

    ReplyDelete
  12. I could be way off here, but I feel like level titles are an outgrowth of OD&D’s links to Chainmail. I’m no expert on Chainmail, but aren’t figures granted titles, such as Hero (equivalent to essentially 4 “Fighting Men”) and Super-Hero?
    Initially, Gary/Dave were using Chainmail Combat Tables, and the level titles were a means of linking the two games: at 4th level you’re equivalent to a Hero, etc. Perhaps once that was codified in the LBB’s, more “fill in” titles were needed (since there’s more levels than Chainmail). That would’ve of course held true for the other classes, including later ones, like the Thief.
    So, yes, Gary whipped-out the Thesaurus and went to work, hence some fairly illogical titles: he needed to come-up with 9 or 10, or whatever, titles for an Assassin, or a Ranger, or a Magic-User, etc, and then just assembled them in whatever order seemed (to him) to make some sort of vague sense.
    Just an idea of mine, I could be 100% incorrect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're not way off at all. That's pretty clearly the origin of level titles as a concept.

      Delete
    2. The magic-user level titles literally come from Chainmail. In addition to Hero and Super Hero units, the Fantasy Supplement also had Wizard units and "lesser" magical types (Sorcerers, Warlocks, Magicians, and Seers) that could be fielded for fewer points at the cost of knowing fewer spells and having to meet higher "Spell Complexity" target numbers to successfully cast them.

      Delete
  13. In temple of the elemental evil, there are two npc who are described as "prefect" p. 59 and 60

    ReplyDelete
  14. The original titles come directly from entries in the Roget's Thesaurus. Possibly even in the same order. I remember stumbling across that once reading the thesaurus. It's a little like the monks level titles being named after Mah Jong pieces.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Now here's a conundrum. Wikipedia has an entry for the Greyhawk character Rary which says: "Rary was a wizard created by Brian Blume and played only until he reached the 3rd level, at which point Blume retired him, having reached his objective, which was to be able to call his character 'Medium Rary'." Yet that doesn't line up with any of the 3rd level wizard/M-U level titles...? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greyhawk#Significant_player_characters

    ReplyDelete