![]() |
| Artwork by Clark Ashton Smith |
I've already touched on the fact that, compared to his contemporaries, H.P. Lovecraft and Robert E. Howard, the overt influence of Clark Ashton Smith on later writers is minimal and I stand by that assessment. I would, however, like to point out an obvious exception to this: the deity Tsathoggua. Unlike nearly everything else CAS created in his weird tales, Tsathoggua not only reappeared multiple times within his own story cycles but was also used by some of his colleagues in theirs. Indeed, the first time the name Tsathoggua appears in print is not in one of Smith's stories but in Lovecraft's "The Whisperer in Darkness."
In that story, Tsathoggua is mentioned three times, mostly in passing, as part of a litany of other ancient beings, like Cthulhu and Shub-Niggurath. However, one of these mentions not only describes him but associates him with CAS:
It’s from N’kai that frightful Tsathoggua came – you know, the amorphous, toad-like god-creature mentioned in the Pnakotic Manuscripts and the Necronomicon and the Commoriom myth-cycle preserved by the Atlantean high-priest Klarkash-Ton.
Klarkash-Ton is, obviously, Smith and "the Commoriom myth-cycle" is then-unpublished "The Tale of Satampra Zeiros," which had been written in 1929 but not published until a few months after "The Whisperer in Darkness." We must remember that the writers in the Weird Tales circle regularly discussed and shared drafts of their work with one another, which is how HPL beat Smith to the punch when it came to introducing his own creation.
When "The Tale of Satampra Zeiros" was published, Smith talks a bit more about Tsathoggua by reference to one of his idols:
He was very squat and pot-bellied, his head was more like a monstrous toad than a deity, and his whole body was covered with an imitation of short fur, giving somehow a vague sensation of both the bat and the sloth. His sleepy lids were half-lowered over his globular eyes; the tip of a queer tongue issued from his fat mouth.


Yeah, Tsathoggua takes the cake for memorable weird nomenclature. It and Cthulhu. Names come out of contexts and histories, and when you first encounter these names, they carry potent hints at unknown realities. Encountering the name itself can be disturbing. My feeling is that such an effect is exactly what Lovecraft and Smith were after.
ReplyDeleteThere is an absolutely fantastic picture of him, in coloured pencil by Michael Ferrari, in the first Creatures of the Dreamlands book. I always considered him an unofficial god of dungeons, underworlds and catacombs.
ReplyDeleteGot to tell you...I love the Klarkash-Ton name drop. The shoutout made me smile.
ReplyDeleteI never would have put two and two together. I am sure I read it and just glossed over it as a mishmash of letters.
DeleteTSR's Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes (1976) introduced the obvious typo (since the "A" and the "S" keys are adjacent) of "Tsathoggus" on page 46. Some subsequent D&Ders (such as Gabor Lux) prefer and use the typo.
ReplyDeleteIt's susceptible to typos I guess ... "The Trail of Tsathogghua" by Chaosium. I Didn't know about Tsathoggus, at least I dont remember it. But I was inspired by something to create Zsathongis, a demon lord in my home campaign. Maybe it was this name.
DeleteAlthough there's nary a sign of a "whole body was covered with an imitation of short fur," I would like to make the case, based on a cursory comparison of CAS's sketch to the Grognardia masthead, that the PHB idol is none other than a statue of toad-like Tsathoggua, "unofficial god of dungeons, underworlds and catacombs" indeed.
ReplyDelete...i like that notion quite a bit...
Delete...it's not at all supported by dave arneson's text, but in my own lore-canon, his original temple of the frog was a cult to tsathoggua, and stephen the rock a marooned weird-tales adventurer from some dying land at the ends of time...
I do have a theory about Tsathoggua's deep influence on both Howard and HPL: he - above even Cthulhu - is the ideal form embodying the crypto-malevolence of cosmic indifference.
ReplyDeleteWhere Cthulhu hibernates in deep, dreamworld sleep, Tsathoggua is lazy, perpetually sleepy, but dreamless and present. Where Cthulhu is impossibly large, impossible to describe, beyond imagination, Tsathoggua is base, material, seemingly the inspiration of a traditional witches brew (eye of newt, a living frog, hair of bat...) and quite simply described...but he's a shapeshifter.
This lazy, sleepy, shapshifting, gluttonous bat-frog god and son of the god of time and money and excess perfectly symbolized the Great Opponent in the three allies' secret war on the Modern man. Tsathoggua is Modernism: thirsty for blood, but too lazy to hunt, ugly and anti-classical, but attractive to the delusional, greedy "men without chests" (to borrow a contemporary C.S. Lewisism) who offer themselves up as foolish sacrifices.
T.S. Eliot, C.S. Lewis, REH, CAS, and HPL had a common enemy: the soulless, craven, shifting, scrabbling, petty, pompous, scheming, greedy Modern Ideal.
And Tsathoggua was his name.
In Conan the Buccaneer, (L. Sprague de Camp and Lin Carter ), Conan fights a living idol of Tsathoggua. Howard himself never mentioned the god by its full name (I think that's right.) but the monstrosity clearly appears in both "The Black Stone" and "The Thing on the Roof."
ReplyDeleteI don't think it is a stretch to say that "Thog" is the god's nickname, which Howard ascribes to the unkillable frog monster that Conan fights in "The Slithering Shadow."
Although the works obviously tie the three men together in a most familial way, it is nice to confirm it in a letter from Lovecraft to Howard:
"Clark Ashton Smith is launching another mock mythology revolving around the black, furry toad-god Tsathoggua, whose name had various forms among the Atlanteans, Lemurians and Hyperboreans who worshipped him after he emerged from inner Earth (whither he came from outer space, with Saturn as a stepping-stone). I am using Tsathoggua in several tales of my own and of revision-clients."
I think the fact that all three men acknowledge (or at least were aware of) the primordial fundamental nature of the god: known by all people and mythologies and times, at once underworldly and extraterrestrial, amphibious mammalian, aquatic and aerial, slothful and sleepless, gluttonous and indifferent, repulsive and magnetic, distinct and anamorphous, etc., lends weight to exactly why such a base and simple god so captured their collective imagination.
Tsathoggua (like the other big fan-favorite Nyarlathotep) has a _personality_. He's not just an impersonal force or a personification, he's a _person_. He might spare someone who amuses him -- or come up with some whimsical and ironic fate rather than just eating or squishing them.
ReplyDeleteThat's actually a very good point.
Delete