The issue begins with an interesting editorial by Ian Livingstone, in which he talks about the perceived expense of a roleplaying game versus a more traditional boardgame. "Is this all I get?" he imagines a newcomer to the hobby saying upon opening his D&D Basic Set. Livingstone then suggests that, because RPGs are a niche hobby, they'll always be more expensive than their mainstream counterparts. The only way that will change is if roleplaying games were to appeal to a wide enough audience that mass market factors enter the equation. For that to occur, he opines, RPGs "would have to be modified out of all recognition and lose their appeal." I'm not sure that history has proven Livingstone wrong.
"The Fiend Factory" offers up six more monsters in this issue. Perhaps I am unusual in this respect, but I'm tiring of the "The Fiend Factory." I'd much rather see clever ways to use existing monsters – of which D&D already had an immensity in 1980 – than an endless menagerie of new ones. "Open Box" is mostly given over to Judges Guild product reviews, starting with Under the Storm Giant's Castle (5 out of 10) and Dark Tower (9 out of 10). These are joined by reviews of both Operation Ogre (5 out of 10) and Caverns of Thracia (9 out of 10). This is, I think, a fairly representative sample of JG's output over the years – plenty of forgettable mediocrity but a number of true classics as well. Also reviewed is Yaquinto's game Time War, which receives a score of 8 out of 10.
"My Life as a Werebear" is an unusual article by Lewis Pulsipher. In it, he delves into the question of playing a monster as a character in Dungeons & Dragons. Pulsipher then provides for monster classes for use with the game. They're an odd assortment, consisting of the blink dog, lammasu, stone giant, and titular werebear. While I'm unsure I'd ever allow such characters in my own games, I think the guiding principles behind Pulsipher's designs are solid and the end results are good (though why anyone would want to play a blink dog character is beyond me). Shaun Fuller's "The Magic Brush" is a lengthy article on the finer points of painting miniature figures. Not being a painter myself, I can't speak to its utility, but it is clearly thorough in its treatment of its subject.
"The Sable Rose Affair" by Bob McWilliams is a superb scenario for use with Traveller. The adventure is quite detailed and includes lots of maps and NPCs, all of which contribute to its overall excellence. More noteworthy is its presentation as a series of "modules," which are discrete sections focusing on specific events or locales within the overall scenario. Depending on the approach the PCs take, only certain modules are needed, which offers the referee flexibility in how he adjudicates the course of play. "Treasure Chest" details seven new artifacts and relics, after the fashion of the mighty magic items found toward the end of the Dungeon Masters Guide. They're fine, as far as they go, though none really stand out as memorable.
The issue ends with an interview with Chaosium stalwart, Greg Stafford. It's a truly fascinating interview, one worthy of its own post (which I'll write either later today or tomorrow), in which Stafford talks at length not just about the origins of Glorantha, RuneQuest, and Chaosium but also his general philosophy of roleplaying and related activities. There's some eye-opening stuff in the interview serves as a good reminder – as if we needed one – of why Stafford was truly one of the greats of our hobby.
All in all, this was another fine issue, one that brings the magazine ever closer to the one I remember from just a few years later.
Loved The Sable Rose Affair... I think I ran that using Space Opera rather than Traveller for some reason that escapes me.
ReplyDeleteI played through it (in classic Traveller) but never owned this issue so I haven't read the full thing. Now I wonder what "modules" we didn't see in that long-ago playthrough.
DeleteSpace Opera never caught on much locally, although the miniatures rules (and the T-Rex figure range connected with it) were popular for a few years.
At some point one of my PCs ended up with a blink dog follower. DM pulled this WD issue out and I used the class. This was a loooong time ago. Details are really foggie, but the PC and NPC doggo died pretty fast. IIRC correctly over the years there were a lot of monsters as classes in issues of WD.
ReplyDeleteI can actually understand a blink dog's appeal slightly more than the lammasu, which is similarly lacking in opposable thumbs and much, much too big to fit many places a human could. Wouldn't play either myself, but some folks sure do love freak show parties.
DeleteThe cover wasn't original - I recognised it when the issue came out from a paperback I had. I think it was a volume in the Years Best SF series edited by Brian Aldiss and Harry Harrison.
ReplyDeleteGood catch!
DeleteA slightly different version of it is on my VHS cover of the movie DefCon-4.
DeleteI can remember first seeing it in the Terran Trade Authority book "Spacewreck"
DeleteDefinitely showed up in Spacewreck and I think maybe the Space Wars: Worlds & Weapons book that came out around the same time as the TTA series.
DeleteOn a side note, why the heck doesn't that type of "IP-independent scifi" books exist any more? There were a fair few of them (TTA being by far the best known in the US) all published within a few years of one another, and then bam, everyone stopped making them and they've never returned. Closest we've gotten since are all based on franchises like Star Wars, Trek, etc.
That interview with Greg Stafford is great. I loved his description of transforming a perceived, and admitted, flaw in S&S into something that could be developed into it's own thing.
ReplyDeleteGood point about endless monsters without articles discussing new ways to use them. I'd totally dig articles about new uses with same stat blocks.
ReplyDeleteI really like this cover as I have a great fondness for the Terran Trade Authority books. I haven't played much traveller, but I have looted a few of the White dwarf scenarios for them and they usually run pretty well. I'll have to check out sable rose. Thanks for the write up.
I love the TTA books, and have all of them. If I ever run a sci-fi game, that is the universe I would base it on
Delete"I'd much rather see clever ways to use existing monsters – of which D&D already had an immensity in 1980 – than an endless menagerie of new ones."
ReplyDeleteThat's a good point. To some degree the various (and sometimes directly conflicting) "monster ecology" articles in Dragon did that sort of thing, as did books like Lords of Madness where they do a deeper dive into specific classic critters (aberrations, in the case of LoM) without adding a slew of new beasties.
You might enjoy reading the 13th Age Bestiaries for that too. They're mostly filled with classic D&D monsters but the designer's take on many of them is quirky, to put it mildly. Lot of unusual ideas, some tied to the Dragon Empire setting, most not, and loads of suggestions on how you might break from the canon versions or reskin given critters for other uses.