Earlier this month, I posted about my fumbling attempts to come up with an alternative to D&D-style abstract experience points for use in Secrets of sha-Arthan. I received a lot of helpful comments and they, along with private discussions and internal playtesting of the game's draft rules, have begun to bring me closer to a satisfactory solution. That said, there's still a lot of work to be done to get it just right, but then that's the sort of thing with which wider playtesting should help.
It is by now a truism, I think, to state that a roleplaying game's experience/advancement system, whatever form it takes, encourages certain activities and approaches to play by rewarding them. For example, Dungeons & Dragons awards experience points primarily on the basis of treasure, with a smaller but still more significant amount of XP given for defeating opponents. Consequently, D&D, at least in its classical form, is a game where treasure hunting and monster slaying take center stage, since those are the activities by which experience points are earned and characters can advance in levels. Advancement comes through different activities in other games, such as skill use in those derived from Basic Role-Playing.
If you're involved with any RPG long enough, you may notice that players sometimes begin to modify the way they play in accordance with what nets their characters the most in-game rewards. When I was a kid, I distinctly remember occasions when my friends would actively seek out "a few more experience points" by having their characters wander through the wilderness hoping that a random encounter would bring enough XP to achieve the next level. Players of BRP games are, of course, familiar with the phenomenon of "check mongering," in which players seek excuses to make skill checks for their characters, in the hopes of improving them.
I don't necessarily see anything wrong with this kind of emergent behavior. At base, RPGs are games and it's only natural – rational even – that players will try to find ways to use a game's rules to their advantage. Rather than attempting to find ways to disincentivize this behavior in Secrets of sha-Arthan, my instinct is to find ways to harness it to encourage the kind of adventures and campaigns that I enjoy, hence the shift to the accumulation of secrets rather than XP as the method of advancement.
But what qualifies as a secret? There are two kinds of secrets. The first is mundane, namely,
a fact about the setting that the character does not yet know. For example, encountering
Unmaker cultists for the first time would certainly qualify as a secret in this first sense. For that matter, encountering almost
any "monster" for the first time is also a secret. There are many other secrets in this sense – traveling to a far-off city, locating the entrance to a Vault, becoming
aligned with a faction or cult, even coming into possession of a magic item.
However, there's a second type of secret, one that's closer to the usual sense in which the word is used. A secret of this type is something genuinely hidden or unknown, knowledge of which is rare within the setting. It's one thing simply to encounter the aforementioned Unmaker cultists, but it's another thing entirely to understand their origins and the nature of their beliefs. Likewise, many creatures, magic items, and spells tie into obscure aspects of sha-Arthan. These are the "true" secrets of the game.
I opted for this approach to character advancement because I hope it will encourage the kind of gameplay I most enjoy. Both my earlier
Dwimmermount OD&D campaign and my ongoing
House of Worms Empire of the Petal Throne campaigns are rooted in the uncovering of secrets of their respective settings. Refereeing House of Worms in particular has taught me that
piecing together disparate pieces of knowledge about a setting can be very compelling to players. Indeed, it can become a powerful driver of both player and character engagement.
As the players could tell you, House of Worms is comparatively light on combat and treasure seeking; its main focus is and always has been on exploration of its setting and wrestling with the secrets thereof. The campaign's
recent shift is toward an
even greater focus on these matters and there is (as yet) no sign that this has in any way made the campaign less compelling – quite the opposite, in fact. It's my hope that I can "bottle" this approach in
Secrets of sha-Arthan by not only being very explicit about its emphasis on exploration of its setting but also by
rewarding such exploration in its advancement system. I can't pretend that it will be easy to do this well, but, armed with more than eight years of experience in this arena, I feel I have as good a chance as anyone to succeed.
Onward!
I am intrigued. Would there be any differentiation between greater and lesser secrets? For example, Lesser secrets being knowledge of the Unmakers (or having raided one of their, for lack of a better term, places of worship) while a greater secret being knowledge of their origin and the nature of their beliefs.
ReplyDeleteMost definitely. I'll try to post some examples of both types in a future post, along with some creature write-ups that show how the system might work for them as well.
DeleteI like this very much. The emphasis on exploration and discovery is lovely.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea, but I'm worried that it's going to be a lot to track, particularly once you get up into the hundreds of secrets. I already have problems with "You already knew that Count Relepo was part of the Cult of Gold - you found the letters when you destroyed that inn." sort of thing.
ReplyDeleteI hear you and that's a very real concern.
DeleteI could imagine seeing some bigger secrets have a "cost" in these secret points. Or think of a "conspiracy" as made up of many secrets, you would have to know X amount of secrets to uncover the conspiracy, or secret society, etc.
DeleteI like running long campaigns that are as much or more about the relationships with NPCs as fighting and treasure seeking. I disagree that XP mechanisms that don't directly reward seeking information and building relationships is a good approach. This is is a position I hold weakly and could be convinced otherwise. What I'm getting at is that I want my players to chase secrets, info, relationships with NPCs because they have an emotional reason to do so. I want them to be curious, angry, irritated, concerned etc. I don't want them to be looking at their character sheet and calculating how many hexes they need to search before they level up. Those are qualitatively different activities. I "think" the way to encourage that kind of play is to focus on the emotional or narrative content of the milieu more than the mechanical elements. One thing about those secrets being revealed that does tie them back to the XP for GP system is that those secrets help players to kill monsters and get treasure.
ReplyDeleteAlso, those secrets help players to prevent the deaths of their characters which is also important and maybe overlooked incentive.
Ideally, learning greater secrets about the setting leads to more adventures. That is a reward unto itself.
ReplyDeleteIt occurs to me; secrets may be easier to come by in the beginning and become harder over time, as you have encountered all the common monsters etc. You may not be able to use the normal ramping up of required experience / secrets.
ReplyDelete