Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Done with Dungeons & Dragons?

As I alluded to yesterday, I increasingly feel as if I don't have anything interesting left to say about Dungeons & Dragons. On some level, that's understandable. There are nearly 4500 posts on this blog and, though I haven't done an inventory of just how many of them are specifically about D&D, I think it's safe to wager that more than half of them – that's over 2000 posts – pertain to the game in some fashion. With that much virtual ink spilled over a single roleplaying game, even if it is the single most popular and successful one, what more is there for me to say?

Part of the problem, though a small one, is that it's been some time since I actually played any version of Dungeons & Dragons. I kicked the then-current edition of D&D to the curb in 2007, right before I began my OD&D journey and started this blog. I never played either 4e or 5e, as I was perfectly happy, when I wanted to play Dungeons & Dragons, to make use of one of the TSR editions of the game, whether the Little Brown Books, AD&D, or B/X – except that I rarely did so. It's ironic that this should be the case, since Grognardia began in large part as an exploration of the history of D&D and, by extension, the larger RPG hobby. 

Of course, one might reasonably ask, "But weren't you playing Labyrinth Lord and Swords & Wizardry and Lamentations of the Flame Princess and [insert your favorite retro-clone here]? Aren't they just D&D with the serial numbers filed off? Indeed, wasn't that the whole point in their creation?" Similarly, "Haven't spent the last decade playing Empire of the Petal Throne, whose rules are basically OD&D with some changes added?" For that matter, "Isn't Secrets of sha-Arthan, your personal science fantasy game, just like EPT, another variant on good ol' D&D? How can you say you haven't been playing Dungeons & Dragons?" 

These are all fair questions, but, as I noted, my not playing D&D is only a small part of the problem. A much bigger one is simply that, for whatever reason, I don't think I've had any genuinely original insights into the game in a very long time. Sure, I can – and do – mine old Dragon articles or TSR era products for little tidbits of trivia, but it's rare that any of this is insightful. They're mostly exercises in pure nostalgia, exactly the kind of thing detractors of the Old School Renaissance have been criticizing for years. I don't think there's anything inherently wrong in indulging in nostalgia from time to time, especially when your readership is made up overwhelmingly of middle-aged men who remember the glory days of our hobby. However, I don't want that to be the only thing this blog is known for.

2024 is the 50th anniversary of the publication of Dungeons & Dragons. My intention was to devote a lot of time to looking at OD&D and its rules and history. Here we are, almost at the end of the year, and I've done very little of that. I've started and deleted more posts about OD&D and D&D generally than I have about any other game or topic. In almost every case, I either discovered I'd already written about the topic before or that what I wanted to say was rather trite. In a moment supreme irony, even the topic of this post is one I broached only a couple of months ago. It really does seem as if, when it comes to D&D at least, I've done it all – or at least all that I find interesting enough to devote the time to write about.

This is why I'm now looking to spend more time writing about Traveller in the new year. It's a game I've played almost as long as Dungeons & Dragons and about which I am still very passionate. More than that, it's a game about which there's still a lot more I could say. The well of Traveller commentary is far from dry, whether I'm writing about its rules, its history, the Third Imperium setting, or my own involvement in the game's fandom or publications. I feel as if I could write about Traveller for a very long time and not repeat myself than I often do with D&D.

As always, I wrestle with the issue of just how interesting non-D&D topics are with many readers. My most popular posts continue to be those that touch on Dungeons & Dragons in some way, while those that stray farthest from it aren't nearly as well liked. It's a frustrating conundrum. Ultimately, though, I've concluded that, if I'm to continue writing the blog, I need to write primarily for myself, which probably means I'm going to dial down the number of D&D-centric posts – not eliminate, mind you, just reduce. To a very great extent, Dungeons & Dragons is the hobby, so there's no way I could remove coverage of the game entirely, even if I wanted to do so (which I don't). However, I do want to get back into writing insightfully about older games that interest me, hence the increase in Traveller content.

I assure you: I'll write about more than Traveller. As much as I adore the game, I don't think I could make it the subject of every post. Plus, Grognardia began as and remains a broader blog than any one game. The shift I'm making now and into next year is simply a rebalancing of focus rather than the wholesale rejection or closing off of other options. 2025 will certainly bring changes around here, but being "done with Dungeons & Dragons" in a definitive way is not one of them.

38 comments:

  1. As someone toying with the idea of starting a Classic Traveller campaign sometime this year this change sounds great to me. I've only ever played fantasy or fantasy adjacent games, so more insights into a sci-fi sandbox game would be very helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think bringing old posts as "Retrospective" is a good move. Let's say you last post about monster math was done in 2012. I will probable never go back and look at it, so it was like it never happened to me and to anyone that was not active reading at the time, or even to ppl that read but dont remember. But is a subject that if it comes up, I'm interested in reading.

    You could think about bringing good and insightful posts of yours back (original text and add Retrospective at the title) and maybe adding some new thoughts or related links about it in the end of the post. I would love to see that and I think anyone that follow your blog would think the same!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Im on board.I just don't go scrolling through all the old articles. I can't remember what I had for breakfast, let alone what James posted 14 years ago.

      A "greatest hits"...or maybe "critical hits" is a fantastic suggestion.

      Delete
  3. Jim Hodges ---
    I have found an interest in almost everything you've posted over the many years I have been coming here, but I admit D&D remains my primary focus.

    Some other games I'd be interested in reading about if you ever looked back on them (again) may be the Middle Earth RPG that ICE put out, FASA's Star Trek RPG, and of course early (pre-2000) MTG is of interest to me.

    You also mentioned not playing D&D, and I, too, spent years reading D&D books and having an interest in the game long after I essentially quit playing it. (i.e. I come here and read your articles.

    Whatever you do, I probably still will, D&D or otherwise.

    Good luck whatever road you trek down here on this very deserving blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I find Traveller fascinating, as it's the one of the Big Names of which I have very little experience, so I'm very keen to see more content.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "I need to write primarily for myself."
    I think this is the most important thing. I'll avidly read your posts about any system or facet of the hobby, and your archive speaks for itself. You've essentially written many books worth of reflections on D&D, so it makes sense that you might feel you’ve arrived at a different stage. There have been any number of D&D blogs but your sensibility, experience, and insight are what keep readers coming back.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Traveller is one of those read-but-never-played games that I have always been fascinated by, particularly the playable alien races. No matter what you write about, it's worth the read. D&D is the lingua franca of the hobby, but it's not the only one. I wouldn't mind becoming a little more multilingual, especially with you as my tour guide. Travel away!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I will always be far more interested in what you have to say about Traveller than D&D. It's a better game, for a start

    ReplyDelete
  8. You'll be back!

    Just kidding. You have to write for yourself, otherwise you'll lose interest in your blog. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I almost certainly will – but I want to spend the next little while indulging myself in writing more about Traveller than I have thus far.

      Delete
  9. As a reader who found some of your older posts on Traveller, was intrigued, and ended up both introducing a dear friend to Classic Traveller and getting most of the library myself, I would welcome this shift. I appreciate your thoughts on D&D when they are merited going forward, but I think I’ve read every post on Traveller on the blog, and I’m certainly hungry for more. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  10. As a Traveller super-fan I'm very excited about this change in focus! Official Traveller has been through several incarnations and the 2d6 ruleset has it's own OSR too! I hope to read and participate in discussions about Classic Traveller, Megatraveller, GDW, Cepheus Engine, Hostile, and more!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Would love to read posts from you on Traveller. Perhaps some on Thousand Suns as well!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sure, I like the posts about D&D in all its incantations. However, I like your writing style and the things you write about, so whatever you choose to write about is fine with me and I'll continue to read it all. I am here for *your* insights, not for one particular game.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don’t often have the time to comment, but I read all of the posts and was most happy to see posts on EPT/Tekumel. Although I bought nearly all of the Classic Traveller material back in the day, I only managed to play a few times, so would love to see discussion of that. (I wasn’t a fan of MegaTraveller or later incarnations but perhaps your writings will change my opinion.)

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm squarely in that old guy demographic that started with 1E and moved on to other RPGs, one of which was Traveller, which I loved. Count me in the crowd looking forward to more Traveller entries. And thank you for your prolific output - I very much enjoy an almost daily RPG read whether OD&D, AD&D, or Traveller!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I took a quick break from my Traveller prep to check my feed reader. I fully support this.

    ReplyDelete
  16. “ especially when your readership is made up overwhelmingly of middle-aged men who remember the glory days of our hobby” Well I’m certainly an outlier here.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Obviously I'm up for more Traveller discussion any day. I'm also a staunch advocate of blogging that DOESN'T deal with ampersand and friends.

    It amazes me that people can still find something to say about the ol' girl. Its like a dead horse beaten into dust and yet a massive crowd gathers daily to endlessly continue the flogging.

    ReplyDelete
  18. More Traveller thoughts makes me very happy, looking forward to it. If not mentioned already by you, maybe a post on related Traveller blogs, like Tales to Astound's Out of the Box series? https://talestoastound.wordpress.com/tag/traveller-out-of-the-box/

    ReplyDelete
  19. I have to admit I initially was attracted to this blog because of the D&D related posts, but (at least partly) stayed because of the coverage of the entire TTRPG hobby (and not 'just' D&D). I have similar feelings towards Shannon Appelcline's "Designers & Dragons" series; I started reading them because of TSR and WotC, and then bought/read the entire series because of it's coverage of the all/most TTRPG companies. I think I will keep enjoying reading your posts, even if they will not be about D&D as often as in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think this is an accomplishment. D&D obviously has a long history, so running out of things to talk about I think speaks to the comprehensiveness of what you do. You should be proud of starting the blog that launched a thousand OSR blogs, but I think its fair to say theres probably several books worth of content on Moldvay VS Mentzer online at this point, and thats probably enough.

    Also, and I have no idea how popular these articles would be, nor do I know how the economics of running a blog like this work, but as your wrapping up your Empire of the Petal Throne campaign, I'd love to know how you pick your next game.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beyond spending untold hours writing for free rather than something more productive, there's not much to the economics of this blog ;-)

      Delete
  21. Ran into the very same issue when DM Vince and I DM Nick were doing the Roll for Initiative podcast. We did it for 10 years (2009-2019) and we pretty much ran out of show ideas. We covered all of the topics we could. I suggested we try to cover the OSR scene, but interest wasn't there and there were other podcasts doing the same thing. Vince is back doing his Evil DM podcast, which is really great BTW. I may try to join him in the future. We'll see...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Writing about RPGs is writing about Dungeons & Dragons, the only difference is how directly or indirectly.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm OK with more Traveller content. And more T2k, as well.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think you're being a bit hard on yourself, but I do understand your sentiment.

    I am very much looking forward to your Traveller posts. While I have the pdf of Classic Traveller nd have rolled up a few characters (that was fun in itself) I've never played it, so I'm really curious on what you say.

    BTW your style of writing is really enjoyable. It's almost if we are sat in two cosy armchairs talking.

    ReplyDelete
  25. 1. Do what makes you happy. The readers will follow.
    2. When you post about non-D&D subjects it takes me back to those wonderful gaming stores where the stock seemed to be a hodge-podge of games and the possibilities were endless... "Hey guys! The cover of this Warhammer book seems cool, want to try it? There certainly seems to be a lot of little black books, what are they about?"

    ReplyDelete
  26. Ok I’m done reading you

    ReplyDelete
  27. Just to add that the wealth of Grognardia's D&D content is still 'there' and available. I tend to use the search function a lot, particularly when I ponder to myself "I wonder what James thinks of this module or that setting...." I've been rediscovering Traveller myself recently, so bring it on! It will only add to the richness of the site.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Understandable. I myself am generally *more* interested in the
    D&D content, but not exclusively so -- and if, as you say, you simply don't have anything left to say on the topic, then it's not like the choice is between Traveller articles or D&D articles anyhow. It's Traveller articles or nothing,and we had eight years of the latter. I'll takes my chances with Traveller this time. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hmmmm. Your blog of course. I am so amateur in the whole RPB/Fantasy world, I don't feel I offer anything to the discussion - except this. As one who only really played D&D to keep up with my kids in the 2000s (Potter/LotR mania), I nonetheless have fond memories of the topic of D&D. For people like me, D&D is a bit like Xerox or Kleenex. It's a generic term for the whole vast world of RPG/Fantasy based pastimes. Even though I was aware it wasn't the only such game (I recall fans of the game in high school arguing endlessly about which was the best game or better than D&D). Nonetheless D&D was a big part of my memories from back in the day. Which is why I have thoroughly enjoyed your posts, both about the variety of games in the broader genre, but also about the history of D&D. I have found it very helpful. It appears others also think this, based on what you have written about responses to different topics. But of course, your blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There will still be D&D-related content on this blog; it's unavoidable. However, my focus will, for the foreseeable future, be elsewhere, since I simply don't feel as if I have much left to say about D&D that I, not to mention others, haven't said already dozens of times. Rather than repeat myself, I'm taking a break for a while, but I am sure to return to D&D, as we all do.

      Delete
  30. I will continue to read your blog whatever the content is, but I'm very much looking forward to more Traveller content!

    ReplyDelete
  31. ome on, you're playing Dolmenwood!

    ReplyDelete