Sunday, August 31, 2025

One of Us

As we draw The Shadow over August to a close, I'd like to end this series with a moment of reflection. Celebrating H.P. Lovecraft is, for many, a complicated endeavor. It has become fashionable in recent years to criticize him, to magnify his personal flaws while downplaying the extraordinary influence he has had on the worlds of fiction, pop culture (including roleplaying games), and imagination itself. Yet, for all his faults, both human and literary, I have come to see Lovecraft as something more than a historical figure or a subject of controversy. I see him as a kindred spirit.

Lovecraft was, in so many ways, like many of us who have found solace in books, in quiet contemplation, and in worlds of our own making. He was shy, intensely bookish, and at odds with the modern world and its demands, yet he also cultivated wide friendships and a network of mutual support that enriched both his life and the lives of those around him. He endured profound loss and personal difficulty throughout his life, from the death of his father while a child to the even greater loss of his beloved grandfather to a mother whose protectiveness sometimes smothered him Despite that, he carved out a life of meaning through his imagination, his letters, and his multitude of friends.

No one is without flaws and Lovecraft’s were many. But the measure of a man is not in perfection. It is in persistence, in the courage to create, to connect, and to leave something lasting by the time we depart this sublunary existence. In this, Lovecraft succeeded in ways few could. For me, he is a fellow nerd, a fellow writer, and a fellow introvert who managed to create not only stories but, just as importantly, friendships, a community, and a legacy that continues to shape the way we imagine and tell tales decades after his death.

I hope that in following The Shadow over August, readers might come to understand not just Lovecraft’s works, but the man behind them – flawed, human, brilliant, and strangely relatable. Perhaps, in some small way, I hope readers might also recognize in his life the quiet courage it takes to pursue one’s own path, to cultivate one's own circle, and to leave one's mark on the world.

Lovecraft, with all his contradictions, reminds me that being a nerd, being a dreamer, and being devoted to one’s craft are virtues worth celebrating. That, after all, is the real reason why I have spent this month writing in his honor. I hope you have enjoyed it.

9 comments:

  1. Hear hear!

    Lovecraft was a proto-nerd, and while we've seen in our current age how that can be co-opted into or lead down ever more reactionary paths, I don't think that is the natural state of outcomes.

    While he was a flawed person, and certainly shaped by his personal circumstances, I believe that he showed in his letters and his fiction at the end of his life was a start towards the kind of man who would be remembered more fondly today for coming back from those beliefs and attitudes.

    That he passed away before that turn could be completed is a tragedy, but I cannot look at Shadow Out Of Time or Mountains Of Madness and not see the start of a differing relationship with the other.

    "They had not been even savages—for what indeed had they done? That awful awakening in the cold of an unknown epoch—perhaps an attack by the furry, frantically barking quadrupeds, and a dazed defence against them and the equally frantic white simians with the queer wrappings and paraphernalia . . . poor Lake, poor Gedney . . . and poor Old Ones! Scientists to the last—what had they done that we would not have done in their place? God, what intelligence and persistence! What a facing of the incredible, just as those carven kinsmen and forbears had faced things only a little less incredible! *Radiates, vegetables, monstrosities, star-spawn—whatever they had been, they were men!*"

    ReplyDelete
  2. HPL was a complex person, as are we all. He, in many ways, was admirable and offered more value to society than the vast majority of humans ever will. Personally, I don't agree with some of his personal opinions, but I am not one to play thought police either or impose self-righteous priggishness on another.

    For me, actions and behaviors are more what define a person, and HPL seemed to have conducted himself in a respectable manner. As well, he seems like someone I would have enjoyed having conversations with and exchanging ideas with. That is why freedom of speech and free exchange of ideas (even objectionable ones) is so important - you have the chance of convincing someone to change their opinions through debating validity of ideas themselves.

    Thank you, James, for this wonderful series. I thoroughly enjoyed it, and daresay, was even excitedly refreshing my screen at times, waiting for the next post in the series.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've enjoyed reading the articles this month. There is no argument that the texts composed by HP Lovecraft have been influential within a genre. But I wonder why anyone would consider him a fellow spirit because he demonstrated persistence (as you put it) in clearly noxious attitudes. I find little to admire in the man. Why not simply focus on the texts rather than the person?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've been a fan of HPL since my teens, and no one can realistically deny his tremendous influence on (especially ) horror fiction, but also fantasy and sci-fi, and on RPG's. I still enjoy his fiction and his best stories are classics, and I'm not getting rid of my Arkham House editions.

    But, I'm afraid I don't see him as a person I'd care to be like or emulate. Insular, crippled by his own short-sightedness and low opinion of himself. He also probably suffered from some form of depression, I suspect. And while his racism doesn't diminish my enjoyment of his fiction, is does turn me off to him as a person. So while I share your view that he was very much a typical sci-fi and fantasy fan, and might well have been a RPG'er had such things been around at the time, I see him as an example of what not to let oneself become.

    Interesting posts though and thanks for creating them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This was beautifully said and I have nothing to add.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lovecraft is one of those fellas I love reading the comments about. I always root for the virtue-signaling, high-minded out there.
    When I first read HPL, sure there were passages here and there that caused me to raise an eyebrow. And I thought to myself, “My how the times have changed” and maybe even chuckled at the ridiculousness of it, and then finished reading the story.
    But again, to all the modernist moral pillars out there, hats off kids for toeing the line for all us dopes out here, who don’t remember to constantly proclaim how Lovecraft was a jerk! I’m looking forward to Columbus Day, I’m sure I’ll hear from you all then….

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Erick, as you know, virtue-signaling is defined partly by the mental state of the person doing it.

      That is, there is no statement which could be said to be virtue-signaling, without knowing why the person said what they said.

      Given this, explain how you know the people you're criticizing to be virtue-signaling.

      Delete
  7. List the five most prominent people who have "magnified his flaws" (a phrase which does not mean "talking about the flaws that he had which I would have preferred them to ignore"), along with examples of them doing so.

    ReplyDelete
  8. On the image above he looks quite like Christopher Waltz.

    ReplyDelete