Tuesday, October 28, 2025

The Articles of Dragon: "Aesirhamar"

Over the years I've written this blog, I don't think I've devoted much space to the adventures that have appeared in the pages of Dragon. I'm not quite sure why that is. In retrospect, it seems to me that this would be an obvious source of commentary, particularly as I often made use of these scenarios in whole or in part. Perhaps one day I'll go back and correct this omission in a more systematic way. Today, though, I want to focus on a single specific Dragon magazine adventure that I think is genuinely worthy of attention – for a couple of reasons.

Roger E. Moore's "Aesirhamar" appeared in issue #90 (October 1984) and is a companion piece to "Plane Facts on Gladsheim" from the same issue. I'd actually go farther and say that "Aesirhamar" is just as important as the article it accompanies, because it shows how the information in the article is supposed to be used in play. I think that's important in this case. As I stated in my earlier post, "Plane Facts on Gladsheim" is rather dull, focusing primarily on the way that the normal rules of AD&D must be modified to account for the home of the Norse gods. The result is, in my opinion, quite tedious rather than exciting, which is why I never regarded "Plane Facts on Gladsheim" as highly as I did Moore's "The Astral Plane."

With the addition of "Aesirhamar," though, Moore's approach in the accompanying article makes more sense. Now that the Dungeon Master has a scenario set on Gladsheim, he has the opportunity to make use of all those rules changes and exceptions that Moore has laid out. Rather than being abstract ideas, they're very important, tied to an adventure in which high-level characters journey to Jotunheim and must contend not only with its hostile inhabitants but also with the way magic and other abilities are warped by the very nature of this Outer Plane. 

Like a lot of older AD&D adventures, "Aesirhamar" doesn't really have a plot. Instead, it presents a situation and several locales connected to that situation through which the characters journey. In brief, the characters are summoned by some of the Aesir of the Norse pantheon to locate and stop an evil dwarf who is in league with the giant Hargnar Left-Hand. The dwarf is in possession of a mighty magical weapon, the titular Aesirhamar, which was forged in order to kill the gods in revenge of Thor's killing of Hargnar's brothers. It's a pretty straightforward situation, one that's easy to understand and appropriately Norse in its focus.

For the most part, the adventure consists of a series of keyed encounters in Jotunheim while the characters travel there in search of the hammer. Given the nature of the place, these encounters are quite challenging – there are lots of giants here, as well as associated creatures, like trolls – and each one of them will likely test the mettle of the characters. Moore doesn't include any maps of these encounters. Instead, the DM is left to his own devices, tailoring them to his own tastes. This approach was pretty typical of the era in which "Aesirhamar" was published and I don't mean that as a criticism. There was an understanding in those days that the referee could easily whip up his own maps if they were needed.

Of course, the real meat of the adventure is not these encounters per se, challenging though they are, but the overall context in which they occur. The characters are acting as agents of the Norse gods, charged with defeating (or at least neutralizing) a threat to their rule. That's a pretty compelling adventure hook and one I remember being quite effective in my own campaign. One of the player characters, Morgan Just, was an admirer (though not worshiper) of Thor and considered it a great honor to have been chosen to aid him against the giants, whom he already hated. His fellow player characters, though, were a lot more venal, and saw the recovery of Aesirhamar as an opportunity to gain, if not the upper hand, at least some mighty rewards for the gods. Needless to say, this difference of opinion led to some interesting conflicts that helped spur on subsequent adventures.

Ultimately, that's why I have an affection for "Aesirhamar" – it provided me with what I needed to kick off some fun, Norse-inspired AD&D mayhem. It also provided an opportunity for me to make use of "Plane Facts on Gladsheim," which was a plus. In combination, that was enough. Whether that makes "Aesirhamar" good in some objective sense, I can't say. For my friends and I, that was enough.

4 comments:

  1. Hey James - what do you think of the adventures published in Dungeon? Something you could do a new series on, like you have for module retrospectives - include adventures from Dragon, Dungeon, and other places that you found interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for these posts. I have fond feelings similar to yours towards this one and the accompanying article, but not clear memories of what actually happened. I do remember the magazine being passed around at school, in preparation for that weekend's game at my house. Like a lot of high school games, I suspect we never actually finished the adventure?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Prior to Hickmania, plotless adventures were just the way things were done. I think it really helped that teenage boys have a built-in shared plot ("Fight it. Take it.") that dovetailed the HP/XP scoring system. Actual "role playing" was in the early years of our group often muted and inconsistent.

    Roleplaying had developed a little bit by 1984-85 for us, but not so much that we didn't "break" both DragonLance (changed names - Raistlin became "Raisin Bran" - Tasselhoff commited suicide, and we established our own enclave of dragon masters to, you guessed it, acquire more stuff - ignoring whatever plot was supposed to happen) and Ravenloft (the party became vampiric thralls of Strahd and diplomats to evil countries), shattering the modules to our will. I don't remember playing any of the adventures in Dragon prior to playing Ravenloft but I do know that we did setting adventures from Dragon after the Hickmans spun us both up, but also out. Don't know if that was a coincidence though, because I was not long for D&D. Switched to Rolemaster - circa 1986.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your point about the built-in shared plot of teenage boys is well said and genuinely insightful.

      Delete