Monday, November 17, 2025

Pulp Fantasy Library: Nyarlathotep

Like many of the early H.P. Lovecraft pieces I’ve been examining since September, “Nyarlathotep” occupies a remarkably strange position within his larger canon. First circulated in late 1920 in the November issue of The United Amateur, this brief work resists simple classification. It is neither straightforward narrative nor pure prose-poem, neither a true Dreamlands excursion nor an unambiguous exercise in cosmic horror. Instead, it unfolds like a lucid nightmare rendered with almost journalistic precision, a stark vision of societal unraveling and uncanny intrusion that foreshadows many of the motifs Lovecraft would later explore more fully.

Lovecraft himself explained that “Nyarlathotep” arose from a dream. In a letter to Rheinhart Kleiner, he claimed he wrote the opening paragraph “before I fully waked,” suggesting the piece emerged almost directly from the dream-state. If we take him at his word, then the text was composed under a kind of incantatory compulsion, shaped only lightly by later revision, if at all. This immediacy distinguishes it from much of his mature fiction, which he often reworked extensively, and helps explain the breathless, uncanny atmosphere that permeates the piece.

As in many of his early works, Lovecraft was writing under the sway of powerful intellectual influences. After 1919, he immersed himself in the writings of Lord Dunsany and the Dunsanian imprint is unmistakable – the rhythmic prose, the dream-logic, the anxiety over cultural decay. At the same time, the story reflects his long-standing interests in astronomy, Egyptian antiquity, and fin-de-siècle pessimism. “Nyarlathotep” thus emerges from a convergence of impulses, from the mystical to the scientific, from the decadent to the apocalyptic, producing a work that is difficult to categorize but impossible to forget.

The piece itself presents Nyarlathotep as a wandering figure from Egypt who arrives with strange devices and demonstrations that unsettle the modern world. Crowds gather; the narrator, already alienated and uneasy, joins them. Soon the lights fail, machinery breaks down, and people drift into the streets in trances, marching into the darkness as a cosmic doom descends. This is less a story than a sensory and psychological descent. The narrative slips quietly from urban disquiet into full eschatological collapse, mirroring the disintegration of both society and the narrator’s consciousness.

Two elements in particular deserve emphasis. First, this version of Nyarlathotep is far more grounded than his later incarnation as the messenger of the Outer Gods. Here he appears almost human, a darkly charismatic prophet with a pharaonic air, demonstrating marvels that blur the line between science and sorcery. The implication is that modernity’s own tools – technology, rationality, scientific wonder – can serve as gateways to madness. Second, the masses drifting silently through the darkened city prefigure the collective irrationalities found in Lovecraft’s later fiction. More importantly, the collapse is not local but cosmic. Dreams, astronomy, machinery – all fail simultaneously. The universe itself seems to sicken.

Although “Nyarlathotep” predates Lovecraft’s fully developed Dreamlands tales, it marks a crucial step in their evolution. The action takes place in the modern world rather than in dream geography, yet nearly every aspect of it connects to his emerging dream-lore. The narrative is not a record of waking experience but a nightmare revelation, a dream so potent it bursts into daylight and overwhelms the ordinary world. This reversal is central: whereas the later Dream Cycle sends dreamers into symbolic, mythic realms, in “Nyarlathotep” it is the dream that invades the waking world, overriding reason, technology, and even cosmic order.

Stylistically, the story stands at a crossroads. Lovecraft was still under Dunsany’s spell and the imagery unmistakably reflects it. Yet, the creeping cosmic menace anticipates the hybrid mode he would perfect in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, where Dunsanian fantasy interlocks with cosmic horror. Nyarlathotep himself is the clearest bridge between the modes. In Dream-Quest, he returns as a mercurial, godlike being who toys with dreamers and bends fates. The 1920 piece presents his prototype as a wandering prophet of cosmic truth whose presence signals doom. What makes the character unique in Lovecraft’s tales is precisely this dual existence. He moves freely between the Dreamlands and waking reality, linking the two in a way no other entity quite manages. “Nyarlathotep” is the moment that connection first takes shape.

The piece continues to resonate because it feels like a transmission from the edge of consciousness. It's brief, opaque, and deeply unsettling. As a document of Lovecraft’s artistic evolution, it is both important and often underappreciated. It captures the last intensity of his Dunsanian phase even as it gestures toward the cosmic immensities of the later Mythos. That tension between dream and nightmare, fantasy and cosmic dread, gives “Nyarlathotep” its lasting power. It remains one of Lovecraft’s most haunting works, not despite its ambiguity, but because of it.

13 comments:

  1. Wow. You'd really have to know the scope of Lovecraft's writings to be able to appreciate this story. Otherwise it would be a real puzzle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or I'm just projecting meaning onto it where there is none. Your choice ;-)

      Delete
    2. I think you nailed it. And you've got some really flavorful expressions in there: "full eschatological collapse," "wandering prophet ... whose presence signals doom." Sounds biblical. I've often wondered if Lovecraft's Cthulhu fiction takes a page out of the Bible's playbook, but in a dark way.

      Delete
    3. "I've often wondered if Lovecraft's Cthulhu fiction takes a page out of the Bible's playbook, but in a dark way." HPL's works are full of biblical language and allusions, which only makes sense. A century ago, biblical literacy wasn't merely a matter of religion but of cultural literacy. In particular, the Authorized Version (KJV) is not just a, but the masterpiece of English literature; it cast its shadow across virtually every word written in English over the last four centuries; as Luther's German translation essentially defined modern German going forwards, the KJV was one of a handful of works that essentially *are* what modern English became. Again, this is hardly merely a religious issue - no one would accuse HPL piety. It's basic literacy (or the lack thereof).

      Delete
    4. For sure, you're right about literacy. But I wonder if Lovecraft was deliberately borrowing and reinventing. There's the apocalyptic tone, eschatological feel, the appearance of a prophet, resurrection language ("even death may die"), a second coming of a sort (with Cthulhu waking up and rising to walk the earth again), religious people awaiting his awakening. It all seems like biblical ideas, just turned into horror. My musings. Maybe he didn't do it deliberately, but there are similarities there. I know he recommended reading the KJV. (I'm pretty sure I read that somewhere.) And yes, he certainly wasn't a person of faith. Even if he used biblical ideas, the way he used them shows that, it seems.

      Delete
    5. I think Lovecraft's religious perspective is not atheistic in the modern sense of "everything is a random by product of material evolution" and much more in alignment with Gnosticism - the power, promise and release (if not outright apotheosis) of secret knowledge and hidden pasts, combined with the alternate theory that the YHWH/creator entity only portrays itself that way, and is, in fact, an oppressive, evil god whose day is coming, and whose illusions must be overcome. I could be wrong about this, but Lovecraft's literary atheism and cosmology is too vivid - and too full of gods and demons - to share much in common with the dour and dreary material atheism of, say, PZ Meyers, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins.

      Delete
    6. I think you're correct in theorizing that HPL's atheism is not "the dour and dreary material atheism" of our times, but I'm fairly certain, based on what he says in his letters, that he denied the existence of all truly supernatural entities.

      It's interesting you bring up Gnosticism, though, as Richard L. Tierney, in his Simon of Gitta stories, makes a connection between Gnosticism and Lovecraftian cosmicism that I found very compelling.

      Delete
    7. What do his letters indicate? I wouldn’t be surprised that his private atheism was more dour, dreary, and material than his literary.

      Also, as opposed to “an oppressive, evil god whose day is coming”, the end of this story presents “gigantic, tenebrous ultimate gods—the blind, voiceless, mindless gargoyles whose soul is Nyarlathotep” who “dance slowly, awkwardly, and absurdly” to piping and drumming they may not even be able to hear. No naming of Azathoth here, but this is clearly the daemon sultan’s court described elsewhere. I think this is a great literary way to frame the universe as a place where random chaos prevails without purpose, pretty much in line with the material atheistic view.

      Delete
    8. Sadly, I can't recall any specific passages on these topics. However, one thing I do recall was a letter where he argued that pessimism or even cynicism were just as foolish as optimism. He counseled instead indifferentism, since he felt the universe didn't care and, therefore, neither should we. It's pretty close to a Stoic or even Zen worldview in some ways, neither of which I'd describe as dour or dreary.

      Delete
    9. Good he wasn’t dour or dreary. How dour or dreary really are Dennett, Dawkins, Harris, etc.?

      Delete
  2. Thanks for bringing fresh eyes to this piece.

    As you say, it feels like the end of the world caused by an invasion from the Dreamlands up into the collective consciousness of mankind.

    Today, the subconscious mind is dominated by the waking mind and the world it has created. This apocalypse reverses that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For me, this story captures the essence of a nightmare in a way that few authors can. Some of Philip K. Dick's short stories (e.g. "Upon the Dull Earth") also have this feeling. It may not be an accident that both authors had mental health issues.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Asenath Mason, a occult/Luciferian author, argues that Nyarlathotep (the story) is a gnostic initiation, and that Nyarlathotep's later appearance in The Dreamquest of Unkown Kadath where Randolph Carter "passes through" death is a mystery religion, suggesting that Lovecraft saw that the spread of gnosis is inseparable from the spread of Chaos.

    It is an interesting line of thought, whether you buy into it or not.

    ReplyDelete