When I restarted the
Pulp Fantasy Library series
back in September, I did so primarily because I knew I could devote myself to writing about every H.P. Lovecraft story associated with the Dreamlands, even tangentially. Because there are a lot of stories that fit this description, I didn't have to think much about which story I'd write next, which eased a lot of
the burden I'd previously felt about the series. Now that I've concluded that project, I find myself once again pondering what next to write about and I felt some of my former apprehension return. After all, with 350 entries to date, I've written about most (though not all) of the obvious stories.
Because I'd devoted the first month of the year to Clark Ashton Smith rather than to his colleague and fellow January baby, Robert E. Howard, I thought a good way to solve my immediate problem was to find one of his stories I'd never covered before. REH was a prolific writer and, while his tales of Conan and Solomon Kane are probably his best and most well-known, there's still a wealth of options to choose from, especially if I wanted something a little off the beaten path. That's when I remembered "The Thing on the Roof."
Originally published in the February 1932 issue of Weird Tales, "The Thing on the Roof" is a horror story in the vein of Lovecraft's tales of the Cthulhu Mythos. I first came across it in the early '90s in an anthology of Howard's horror fiction edited by David Drake and then, later, encountered an adaptation of it from an early '70s Marvel comic book (Chamber of Chills issue #3). Compared to, say, "Pigeons from Hell," which is likely the most celebrated of Howard's horror yarns, "The Thing on the Roof" is a much more modest affair, but it's still interesting nonetheless, if only for its slightly different take on "Lovecraftian" subject matter.
The story itself is quite short and fairly straightforward. Its unnamed narrator is a scholar and book collector. He is unexpectedly approached by his academic rival, Tussmann, who offers to publicly retract his previous aspersions on his work in exchange for help obtaining the rare 1839 “black book” edition of Friedrich von Junzt’s Nameless Cults. Tussmann has become obsessed with a passage describing a remote “Temple of the Toad” in Honduras, where a mummy wearing a toad-shaped red jewel supposedly guards a hidden treasure and believes only the 1839 edition contains a full description of the temple. After months of effort, the narrator secures a copy and Tussmann confirms that the original text contains crucial details omitted from later editions. Claiming firsthand knowledge of the temple from a previous expedition, Tussmann then departs for Central America determined to recover the treasure of the temple, convinced that the jewel is, in fact, a key to a store of gold concealed beneath the altar.
Months later, Tussmann summons the narrator to his Sussex estate, where he reveals that he found no gold, only the mummy and the strange jewel, which indeed opened a hidden passage beneath the temple. His account of what lay below is evasive and unsettling and he appears increasingly unstable, hinting that he may have awakened something when he used the jewel to open a subterranean crypt. The narrator, rereading von Junzt, realizes the horrifying implication: the “treasure” was not gold but the temple’s monstrous god. That night, amid strange noises and signs of an unseen presence, Tussmann locks himself in his room with the jewel. The narrator later breaks in to find him dead, his skull crushed by what appears to be the imprint of a gigantic hoof and the jewel missing, suggesting that whatever was released from the temple has followed its key back to England.
As a story, "The Thing on the Roof" is a modest affair. Most of the story consists of conversations between the narrator and Tussmann, as the two discuss historical details about von Juntz, the Temple of the Toad, and related matters. For a Robert E. Howard tale, it's devoid of almost any action, which is probably its most remarkable quality. As a story, it's fine – nothing special but perfectly serviceable for the kind of story it is. For whatever reason, Howard himself really like the tale, writing in a 1930 letter to his friend Tevis Clyde Smith that "this story is by far the best thing I have ever written and one which I am really inclined to believe approaches real literature, distantly, at least." Even overlooking an author's inevitable blindness about his own material, REH's self-assessment is overly charitable.
"The Thing on the Roof" is worth a read, because it's quick and has a few interesting elements, even if it's far from Howard at his best. Sometimes, even Homer nods.
Thanks for the PFL post, James! I wonder if REH's assessment of this story is overly charitable, or if it's a sign of self doubt.
ReplyDeleteYou say it's unlike his work, almost devoid of action. I wonder if he believed that quality gave this story the respectability that his body of work lacked, certainly in the minds of literary critics of the day. If this story is the one that he believes most "approaches real literature," what does it say of REH's assessment of all the stories he wrote that came before? Did he believe he was just a pulp hack?
It reminds me of brilliant, ingenious comedians who still somehow seek "respectability" and make a drama movie that pleases film critics.
Thank goodness REH shook this off and went on to create Conan the barbarian!
The Thing on the Roof inspires my suggestion for your next crooked turn in Pulp Fantasy Library:
ReplyDeleteThe cursed and forbidden books of the pulps.
In The Portrait of Dorian Grey the portrait itself is not a supernatural cause, but merely the product of a poison, yellow book bestowed by Lord Harry to Dorian. That book is clearly a direct inspiration (or striking, haunted coincidence) for Chambers' story The King in Yellow and the fictional script and play of The King in Yellow, whose occult knowledge and curses spawned so many of the "forbidden books" of the pulps.
A lot of the "gaslight pulps" like "The Devil's Manuscript", by Levett-Yeats, "The Tractate Middoth" and Henrietta Everett's "Fingers of a Hand" are "damned book"-themed, and they directly fed Algernon Blackwood's "Whisperers," Margaret Irwin's "The Book" (though technically I think it first appeared in a literary magazine - I know it was re-printed in the pulps), "Midnight Express", "The Night Wire" by H.F. Arnold, etc.
So, even beyond the Necronomiconacolytes like HPL, CAS, REH, Bloch and Dereleth in the pulps, cursed books, doomed libraries, and unspeakable texts clearly were "in the water" that poisoned such early D&D supplements as Eldritch Wizardry (and the rumored, redacted, annihilating Codex of Infinite Planes.
As for "The Thing on the Roof" itself, I rate it much more highly than you do. I find it absolutely remarkable in it's mult-scrival palimpsest:
ReplyDeleteThe first character to appear is the text of Justin Geoffrey, the wizard-poet who had died, raving mad,in a sanitorium, 4 years prior, at the age of 19. Howard had in an earlier story featured Geoffrey as a likely victim of "The Black Stone" in Hungary.
Though never stated (to my knowledge) in any of the Geoffrey-adjacent stories, it is clear in context, that he too had come under the influence of Nameless Cults by Von Jundzt, whether in its "miraculously" preserved original edition, or in a Golden Goblin counterfeit. (as a youth, completely oblivious to poetry, he slept outside a cabin and thereafter suffered strange dreams that inspired his almost instantaneous obsession with and mastery of occult poetry. Essentially the plot of Evil Dead 2).
His poetry warned specifically against seeking the unnamed Toad-god:
"Aristius slept no more for he had thrown open Doors not meant for human hands, and had felt dark winds blow cold on his fear-mad face from Outer Gulfs."
"Behind the Veil, what gulfs of Time and Space?
What blinking, mowing things to blast the sight?
I shrink before a vague, colossal Face
Born in the mad immensities of Night."
The way the various texts work together, using counterfeits and warnings, not as a ward, but a lure, to attract the obsessions of the falsehearted, is - to me, at least - action-packed.
I wonder if REH was most impressed with his economical detailing of the complex relationship between two craven men through the story. After all, the story itself appears itself to be a carefully crafted confession by the Narrator, designed to get him off the hook...for something unspoken.
Tussman is described as a mercenary and a liar, but why? Because he discredited the tome of the Narrator: Evidences of Nahua Culture in Yucatan. Why? According to the Narrator, for no good reason. But in reality, Tussman clearly has at least a theory that Toltec, or some other mystery people-group predated the Nahua and may be the originators of the Narrator's "well researched" evidence of the Nahua.
In other words, the Narrator's highly regarded book may very well have been bunk! and Tussman's greater travel experience (as a "mercenary," after all) may have provided the counter-evidence to attack the mostly theoretical work of the sedentary Narrator. Nahua (aka Aztec) culture extends to Honduras, so Tussman's insights into the Narrator's errors, again through his deeper study (he at least had researched the Golden Goblin edition to led him to seek the original edition. The evidence in that contradicted, or at the very best, provided cultic context for, the Narrator's evidence of Nahua (vs. earlier, separate) culture.
Since the Narrator is clearly spinning his story in his favor from the very outset, and he includes the lines from the mad poet, tying the poet to his discrediting of Tussman, he uses his own second text (the written confession/likely story) to shield the reader from what really happened.
He even resolves the bad blood between the two men well before Tussman's spectacular and untimely end. Maybe it happened just that way. Or maybe the Narrator needs his reader to be enchanted by his own word-spell. Maybe gold wasn't Tussman's obsession, and maybe the Narrator was no innocent bystander.
The Thing on The Roof interweaves book collecting and at least eight unsettling texts (Out of the Old Land, Evidences of Nahua Culture in Yucatan, Nameless Cults, the Black Book edition, the Greek translation of The Necronomicon, the Bridewall pirated edition of Nameless, the Golden Goblin redacted revival) plus the "benevolent" rejection of Tussman's retraction in The Scientific News.
The sheer economy of Howard's almost infintely recursive language in defense of the Narrator, using a very creepy network of books, forbidden knowledge, and rhetoric is impressive to me. I put it among his best.
Chamber's King in Yellow and all things concerning such is not to be named or discussed.
ReplyDeleteHave you seen the Yellow Sign?