Penny Petticord's "News from HQ" has two items worthy of note. The first is an announcement that Polyhedron is actively seeking submissions from readers. Petticord states that "only a few members" have thus far been making submissions and she'd like to change that. I wish I'd paid more attention to this at the time, because I made several submissions to Dragon while I was in high school and all were rejected. I might have had a better shot with Polyhedron, given the dearth of submissions. Secondly, Petticord warns readers that the next issue will a "special April Fool" issue, so "don't believe anything you read" in its pages. Fair enough!
This issue also features a large letters page, with multiple letters written in response to Roger E. Moore's "Women in Role Playing" essay from issue #20, While not all of the letters were critical, many of them were, largely because the readers felt that Moore had "belittled" or otherwise failed to understand female gamers. Though Moore apologizes for any unintended offense, he nevertheless stands by what he wrote, noting that it's an important topic in need of more frank discussion. Some things never change, I guess.
Gary Gygax returns to this issue, writing yet again about marlgoyles and their reproduction. He provides AD&D stats for every stage of the creature's growth from hatchling to mature. It's baffling to me, but it's definitely in keeping the naturalism that's a hallmark of his worldbuilding. He also provides stats for a "monster" that was somehow left out of Monster Manual II – amazons. Amazons, in Gygax's vision, are a female-dominated society of barbarians, with menfolk in secondary or support roles. Beyond that, he doesn't have much more to say about them, which I found a little disappointing, because they're a great fantasy concept worthy of inclusion in D&D.
Frank Mentzer's "Spelling Bee" focuses on druid spells and abilities. Interestingly, Mentzer concern this time seems more focused on reining in druid abilities (like shapechange) that he thinks can be easily abused rather than on finding new and creative ways to make use of them. "The RPGA Network Tournament Ranking System" article is not especially interesting in itself, at least to me. However, the accompanying ranked list of RPGA judges and players is. Gary Gygax, for example, is the only Level 10 Judge, just as Frank Mentzer is the only Level 9. There are no Level 8 or 7 Judges and only one Level 6 (Bob Blake). The names on both lists include quite a number of people who either were at the time or would later be associated with TSR or the wider RPG world. It's a fascinating window on a particular time in both the hobby and the industry.
"In the Black Hours" is an AD&D adventure for levels 6–9 by David Cook. The scenario is unusual in a couple of ways, starting with its lengthy backstory about a high-level mage who learned the true name of the demon lord Juiblex and, in order to protect himself, was eventually forced to imprison the demon with a magical crown. That crown has now come into the possession of a merchant who wishes to protect it from would-be thieves (employed by Juiblex's demonic underlings who wish to free him). The characters are hired by the crown's present owner to protect it over the course of the night when he believes the thieves will make their attempt. There's a lot going on here and the basic structure of the adventure – mounting a defense against waves of attackers – seems well suited to a tournament set-up. If anyone ever played this scenario (or one like it), I'd be very curious to hear how it went.
"Away with Words" by Frank Mentzer is a 26-word multiple choice quiz that challenges the reader's knowledge of High Gygaxian words. It's a fun enough little diversion, though less hard now, thanks to the ubiquity of online dictionaries. "Unofficial New Spells for Clerics" by Jon Pickens does exactly what it says: offers a dozen new spells for use by clerics. Most of these spells are connected in some way to existing magic items, like the staff of striking or necklace of adaptation, filling in gaps in the spell list that, logically, should exist. While that certainly makes sense, it's also boring and exactly the kind of magic-as-technology approach that I've come to feel kills any sense of wonder in a fantasy setting.
"Dispel Confusion" continues to narrow its scope. This issue we're treated only to questions pertaining to D&D, AD&D, and Star Frontiers. Most of them are the usual collection of nitpicks and niggling details. However, one stood out as noteworthy (and indeed unexpected):
Joseph Pillsbury is still an active artist and author. His web site is found at:
ReplyDeletehttps://josephpillsbury.com/Home.html
His Dragon cartoons are available from that site in a compilation book called A Dragon Smirks.
I think what you’re seeing as a “by the book line” is a natural response to having people send in questions. What else would the answer be if not rooted in the book? The actual wording doesn’t surprise me at all: it’s the way Gygax and others always said to play the game throughout their time at TSR.
ReplyDeleteThere seems to me to be a sort of Cult of a Cult of Gygax that is very difficult to counter, because any evidence against it (Polyhedron literally recommended against a strict rules interpretation) is taken as evidence for it (they must be changing their mind).
It reminds me a lot of a very common method of news reporting. On Monday, a news outlet will report that Public Figure said something totally out of character for Public Figure. On Tuesday, the same outlet will report that they’re trying to walk back Monday’s statement. Almost always, when I go to the source, I find that Monday’s attribution was not only out of character, Public Figure never actually said it. The news outlet was reporting an interpretation as if it were fact, and when evidence came in countering that interpretation, it became further evidence in support of that interpretation.
Apparently Gary was the one guy who was officially allowed to play by unofficial rules? That's bizarre. But not as bizarre as the second part of the answer: "Each player is entitled to privacy when it comes to character details". Privacy from whom?
ReplyDeleteRPG paparazzi?
DeleteJust a guess, but maybe the "privacy" comment reflects the older, competitive style of play that apparently prevailed in '70s Lake Geneva and other places, especially where PCs would move among different campaigns.
DeletePerhaps it was expected players would keep their characters' stats as secret from each other as cardplayers protect their hands.
As for unofficial rules, it does seem to be a loosening of TSR's official position, but the caveat is telling: "modify the system... without damaging its integrity." The theme running through all Gygax's and others' pronouncements was that AD&D was so finely tuned for balance that any changes would break the game. Evidently, Gygax and his players were willing to take the risk.
(odd, suddenly I'm having that sign-in issue with blogger that you had mentioned, when I've never had it before. not a big deal for today.)
ReplyDeleteso I'm wondering if this is one of the earliest incarnations of "rules(book) lawyer" to be seen in print? I'm especially interested because I submitted a question to Treantmonk who did a whole video on it recently.