Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Retrospective: Star Trek Tricorder/Starship Sensors Interactive Display

My love for FASA's Star Trek the Roleplaying Game is well-known. I don't think the game is without flaws by any means, but what I appreciate about it is how well it -- and many of its supplementary products -- captured the spirit and feel of Gene Roddenberry's science fiction vision. Consequently, my friends and I played the heck out of the game when it was released back in 1982. We also purchased a fair number of the supplements FASA cranked out for it, including this oddity, the Star Trek Tricorder/Starship Sensors Interactive Display. published in 1984.

Designed by David R. Dietrick (who produced the visuals and the original concept) and William John Wheeler (who wrote the actual game mechanics behind it), the Display was a two-sided cardboard sleeve with an illustration of a tricorder on one side and a computer panel on the other. Each side had a series of small windows cut out of the sleeve. These windows were associated with cardboard wheels that were attached to the sleeve with brass fasteners. By spinning the wheel, a different entry would appear in the window, such as "Bird/Avian" or "300" or "Romulan." There was also a larger window at the top through which cardboard strips with pictures (inserted into one side of the sleeve) could be viewed.

The idea behind the tricorder was that the Display could be used to simulate a character's use of a tricorder or a sensor panel aboard a starship. Whenever a skill roll was attempted in the game, depending on the result (and the overall rating of the character attempting it), the referee would consult a 16-page booklet included with this product. There, he'd find charts listing "data" that he could then impart to the player by stating, for example, "Turn Wheel A to 23," which would result in the player learning that the object being tracked was "moving laterally." As there were four wheels, plus the larger window display, more data could be imparted for more successful skill rolls, thereby simulating what a character might learn from a particular adept use of technology.

The Display is not without flaws, the most significant being that the information listed under each data wheel didn't always follow a logical sequence or progression, meaning that, until the referee gained some facility with the information, he might have to spend some time looking on several lists to find just which wheel contains "silicon based" or "a billion." Likewise, there were limits to how much detail the Display could impart with just four wheels and one window. Extremely specific information, never mind concepts unique to a referee's adventure or without precedent in previous Star Trek episodes/movies, had to be imparted "the old fashioned way" rather than by recourse to the Display.

Despite that, I really liked the Display. It certainly made playing the science officer more fun. In the past, it was fairly typical to see something like the following:
Captain: Science officer, what do your sensors show?
Science Officer: (rolling) [To referee:] I got a 35; what do they show?
Referee: There's a starship of unknown design fleeing the system at Warp 3.
Science Officer: [To captain:] There's a starship of unknown design fleeing the system at Warp 3.
In short, the science officer was reduced to being a parrot or, worse yet, cut out of the dialog entirely as the referee simply imparted information that, in the game, only someone using the right device could know. With the Display, the referee could pass along information to the science officer "secretly," thereby giving him the chance to reveal what he has discovered. It's a small thing perhaps, but I generally found it added fun to the game, even if it had its drawbacks and limitations. I'm not usually one to recommend the use of props in a tabletop roleplaying game beyond really basic things like mock newspaper articles and similar documents, but the Star Trek Tricorder/Starship Sensors Interactive Display is a rare exception I happily make.

12 comments:

  1. Zzarchov KowolskiJuly 18, 2012 at 8:14 AM

    Repeating what the computer says is a valuable part of starship operations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd never heard of this though I played that system a lot. Sounds like it might have been fun. I guess the same effect can be achieved with two laptops nowadays...

    ReplyDelete
  3. This was great! My group immediately latched onto this when it was released.

    ReplyDelete
  4. David Deitrick's original prototype (and the one he used in games he ran and played) was quite a bit different--its dials fed out more general "hard data" that left a lot more room for the PC user/science officer to interpret. That meant, not only was the sicence officer not a parrot, but the player of the science officer had to do some significant guesswork and problem solving to interpret the data. This was, no doubt, influenced by Deitrick's time spent as an intel officer in the Army, but it was also very typical of the heavy-on-player-problem-solving games he preferred to run and play.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The long-enduring debate of which Enterprise Captain would
    win in every fan’s epic showdown has spilled over with guts and gore. See the battle of the Zombie Captains as Kirk
    and Picard go head to head on the Zombie Walk of Fame at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/04/star-trek-zombies-from-zombie-walk-of.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nerd #1: "What is it?"
    Nerd #2: *fiddles with scanning device* "Unkown Captain, but it's some kind of carbon-based douche-bag."

    Quotes from the movie 'Just One of the Guys'

    ReplyDelete
  7. I still have this gaming device and it did help a lot. I have often thought with the ubiquity of smartphones (smaller than TOS tricorders) the GM could text the science officer the "data". Someone smart should make an app for that so it looks like a Tricorder.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I suspect there are quite a few people like ourselves who loved FASA trek than they let on. I have tons of good nostalgic memories of FASA Trek and few memorable sessions of everybody's darling AD&D.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That does sound great! And so Dave Morris' idea (previously in this thread).

    ReplyDelete
  10. That prototype sounds very immersing. Why didn't FASA release that version?

    ReplyDelete
  11. That seems like a great idea. At the same time, it's only a little bit different from just, writing it down on a piece of scrap paper and handing it to the science officer.

    ReplyDelete
  12. My understanding is that it was redesigned to interact more with the game mechanics.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.