Monday, September 1, 2025

The End(?) of Pulp Fantasy Library

In Grognardia's early days, one of its signature features was Pulp Fantasy Library. If you glance at the “Popular Topics and Series” box down the right-hand column, you’ll see more than 300 entries under that heading. The idea was simple: highlight the works of pulp fantasy literature that shaped not only my own imagination but, more importantly, those that shaped founders of the hobby of roleplaying. Like so much of Grognardia, Pulp Fantasy Library grew out of my conviction that you can’t really grasp the origins of RPGs without engaging the books, authors, and ideas that inspired it.

Of course, the series didn’t stay neatly confined. Over time, I pushed at its boundaries, sometimes gleefully so. I wrote not only about sword-and-sorcery or weird tales but also about science fiction, horror, comics, movies, and the occasional oddball work that defied easy categorization. I often made light of this stretching of definitions, but, in truth, I was doing something larger, namely, charting the imaginative landscape that predated and nourished the hobby. RPGs didn’t spring from nowhere, after all, and Pulp Fantasy Library was my way of mapping the soil they grew in.

The Shadow Over August reminded me of just how much I enjoyed this work. Revisiting four of Lovecraft’s stories made two things clear. First, there’s still a vast reservoir of older literature, much of it influential on RPGs, some of it simply worth reading, about which I've never written. Second, doing these posts properly is no small task. Reading (or rereading), researching context, and writing thoughtfully about them takes a great deal of time and energy, more than I can always justify with so many other projects competing for my attention these days.

Much as it might seem otherwise, Grognardia remains a hobby project and hobbies come with limits. That’s part of why I find myself asking whether Pulp Fantasy Library has already run its course and there's really no need to revive it – or perhaps is it ready for a metamorphosis of some kind? Many of the works I’d still like to tackle don’t sit comfortably within the strict “pulp fantasy” label. Maybe the time has come to evolve the series into something broader, which reflects the full range of the cultural and literary roots from which roleplaying sprang.

I haven’t made up my mind about whether or not I should return to the series and, if so, in what form or frequency. What I do know is this: I remain as fascinated by these seminal works as ever and I believe they still matter deeply to anyone who cares about where our hobby came from. The real question is whether readers share that conviction strongly enough to make it worthwhile for me to continue.

Do you want to see Pulp Fantasy Library return in some form? Is this the kind of writing you value from Grognardia? Let me know. Your responses and, frankly, your encouragement will help me decide not only the fate of Pulp Fantasy Library but also the future direction of the blog itself.

17 comments:

  1. I'm a teacher and scholar of literature, and I have always loved this series. I've enjoyed your takes on books I've read and loved, and I've enjoyed even more learning about authors and works I either never got around to or never even knew existed.

    I would welcome an expansion of the concept to bring in a wider range of cultural products as well. The insight and analysis matter more to me than which specific works you choose to discuss.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love the pulps and the work you have done bringing their history and their influence on RPGs to light.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pulp Fantasy Library introduced me to a lot of work I had never even heard of and inspired me to read a lot of it. With a full time job and young kid it's harder to read consistently, but every Pulp Fantasy entry here is another book that goes on my list. I'd love to see the series continue if it isn't too big a time sink!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think reading recommendations for gamers has been covered well enough by Appendix N, yourself, Goodreads and others.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'll echo what Anon said in his post and reply above.I've enjoyed your PFLs a lot.
    But I see the value in setting yourself limits and boundaries about what material you'll cover.
    The paradox of discipline is that it sets you free.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes and Yes. Though it may we "well covered" elsewhere, not everything has been covered by you, and that makes all the difference. To help you drive on, perhaps consider this list: https://adventuresfantastic.com/the-golden-age-of-sword-sorcery-1929-1949-a-guest-post-by-will-oliver/

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've found these posts to be among the most enjoyable/interesting that you post. Would lover to them continue in some form going forward

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, the Pulp Fantasy Library series has always been my favourite part of this blog, so I'd love to see more entries and an expansion of the parameters would be great. I've discovered a lot of new authors thanks to you and I look forward to discovering even more.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Please keep going with the Pulp Fantasy Library. I encourage you to examine David Lindsay's A Voyage to Arcturus (1920), which is the most imaginative and most powerful work of fantasy I have ever read.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, keep going with Pulp Fantasy Library. I love it!

    Here is a list I got from the blog Tellers of Weird Tales:

    Who Wrote the Most Stories for Weird Tales?

    1. Seabury Quinn, 145 stories and 14 articles, for a total of 159 works in prose
    2. August W. Derleth, 101 stories under his own name, plus 13 stories under the pseudonym Stephen Grendon (114 total), plus 22 stories in collaboration with others
    3. Edmond Hamilton, 76 stories
    4. Robert Bloch, 66
    5. Clark Ashton Smith, 63
    6. Robert E. Howard, 54
    7. H.P. Lovecraft, 49 stories on his own, plus 4 in collaboration with others, not counting revisions and ghost-written stories
    8. Manly Wade Wellman, 39 stories on his own, plus 1 in collaboration with others
    9. Paul Ernst, 37
    10. Allison V. Harding, 36
    11. Frank Owen, 34
    12. Mary Elizabeth Counselman, 30
    13. (tie) Arthur J. Burks, 29
    13. (tie) Harold Lawlor, 29
    14. Frank Belknap Long, 28 stories on his own, plus 1 in collaboration with others
    15. (tie) Henry S. Whitehead, 26
    15. (tie) Alvin F. Harlow, 26, all of which are articles
    16. Ray Bradbury, 25
    17. E. Hoffman Price, 24 stories on his own, plus 2 in collaboration with others
    18. Arlton Eadie, 24
    19. Henry Kuttner, 23 stories on his own, plus 2 in collaboration with others
    20. David H. Keller, 22

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pulp Fantasy Library is one of my favorite parts of your blog. PLEASE continue with it, in some form or fashion! Expanding it might make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm going to echo what several others have said: Pulp Fantasy Library is my favorite thing about Grognardia.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes, please continue!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I also love the PFL entries. As a wise one once said, "RPGs didn’t spring from nowhere, after all, and Pulp Fantasy Library was my way of mapping the soil they grew in." This reflection is so important to the hobby and you do it well.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I enjoyed this series, and learned a lot from it. But in my opinion the best entries were where you had a lot to say about the story, rather than just summarizing it. If you can write many paragraphs about its influence on the hobby beyond the summary, I think that's a valuable entry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The funny thing is that, when I don't include a summary, I often get complaints that the commentary makes less sense because the commenter in question has never read the story. It's a bit frustrating.

      Delete
  16. James I believe that your contributions to date with FPL have been tremendous and greatly appreciated by your audience. However, you have many projects on your plate which you need to prioritize for your fulfillment. If you never do another FPL post there is plenty for us to chew on there and the other topics on which you are working which will keep your audience coming back and I am sure engaged.

    ReplyDelete