Tuesday, June 17, 2025

REPOST: The Articles of Dragon: Ares

I'm going to cheat for today's installment of this series. Rather than focusing on a single article from issue #84 of Dragon (April 1984), I'm instead going to talk about Ares, the magazine's new science fiction gaming section. First, a bit of background. Between 1980 and 1982, SPI published a gaming magazine entitled Ares. The magazine included a complete game in every issue (as was once typical of wargaming magazines), along with articles and reviews. Though not limited to sci-fi by any means, Ares did have a slightly science fictional bent to its content. There were eleven issues of Ares before TSR acquired SPI in 1982, followed by five more issues after the acquisition. The last stand-alone issue of Ares was published in "Winter 1983." TSR never really knew what to do with SPI's properties and wound up frittering them away over the course of the next few years, in the process alienating the company's considerable fanbase, many of whom (quite rightly) felt that TSR had handled the situation very badly. Though TSR tried to make some use of SPI's name and products, only the Ares name survived for long – and even then, "long" is a relative term.

From issue #84 to issue #111 (July 1986), Ares was one of my favorite sections of Dragon, since I've always been more of a SF fan than a fantasy one. The section featured articles on games like Traveller and Star Trek and Space Opera, as well as Gamma World, Star Frontiers, and a host of superhero games, especially Marvel Super Heroes. Because sci-fi has always played second (or third) banana to fantasy, you'd have expected that the pool of articles would have been pretty shallow in Ares but that wasn't the case. In my opinion, the quality of the articles in this section was consistently high, higher even than that of the rest of Dragon (which is saying something). However, its appeal was definitely more limited, which is why I suspect it was eventually killed. Why devote some many pages of each issue to genres that are also-rans compared to fantasy, especially D&D's brand of fantasy?

To this day, though, when I look back on the years when I subscribed to Dragon, the Ares articles are among those that stick out most prominently in my mind. Its coverage of Gamma World, for example, was truly excellent and I used a number of its Traveller rules variants over the years. And of course Jeff Grubb's regular "The Marvel-Phile" column was invaluable if you were running a Marvel Super Heroes campaign (or even if you weren't and were just a fan of the comics). I've always thought it a pity that a non-fantasy-centric gaming mag never really gained any degree of prominence. GDW's Challenge, where my first published writings appeared, was a decent stab at such a thing, but it eventually folded, too, much to my disappointment. Like Ares, Challenge filled a hole in the hobby that needed filling. In my opinion, it still does.

4 comments:

  1. Another great post! By the time I subscribed to Dragon in 1985 (as a high school guy, with mowing lawn money), I subscribed almost exclusively because of the Ares section. It wasn't until a couple of decades later that I learned, via the internet, that AD&D was a 10,000 lb behemoth in the "rpg industry" and that the sales of every other RPG paled by comparison that I came to understand the business rationale for having the Ares section be just a few pages in the back of the magazine, composed of a surprisingly random series of articles (other than regular features on MSH and Star Frontiers) about a scattershot variety of non-fantasy RPGs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would love to read a series on the standalone Ares magazines and their included games. I collected them at the time and still have most of them. I remember the Wreck of Pandora games in particular being great proto-adventure board games; in fact I've just realised they used adventure paragraphs before the Fighting Fantasy books were published.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I actually did a series of those. Just follow the link in the above post and you'll find them.

      Delete
    2. Whoops, sorry about that. Of course! :)

      Delete