What makes this paradox even more striking is the sheer volume of his correspondence. Lovecraft is estimated to have written somewhere between 60,000 and 100,000 letters. The exact number is impossible to know, since fewer than 10% survive today. Even if we take the lower estimate, it still makes him one of the most prolific epistolarians of the 20th century. These were not perfunctory notes dashed off in haste. Many ran to dozens of pages, dense with his thoughts on history, politics, philosophy, architecture, literature, science, and, of course, his own dreams and nightmares. For many of his correspondents, a letter from Lovecraft was less a personal communiqué than a miniature essay.
It was in these letters, more than in his published tales, that Lovecraft revealed himself most fully. Through them we glimpse the breadth of his interests, the peculiarities of his mind, his recurring dreams, his everyday concerns, and, inevitably, his darker and less creditable opinions. If his fiction shows us his esthetic vision, his correspondence shows us the man behind it.
Perhaps I am biased because of my own proclivities, but Lovecraft’s letters remind me of blogging. He had no blog, of course, but his endless correspondence functioned in much the same way. The letter was his medium of self-expression, his way of thinking aloud to an audience that was at once personal and diffuse. Many of his letters were, in fact, shared among friends or passed from hand to hand, much as a blog post today might be reposted, linked, or shared across social media.
Nor was this his first experiment with a pre-digital mode of communication. Before his vast correspondence, Lovecraft had already been active in something that feels strikingly like a low-tech precursor to blogging, namely, the world of amateur journalism and the Amateur Press Associations (APAs). In the 1910s, he was deeply involved with the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA), editing its official organ, The United Amateur, and publishing some of his earliest fiction and essays there. As anyone familiar with the early history of roleplaying games knows, an APA is a kind of distributed network. Members submit their work, which is then collated, printed, and mailed out as a collective periodical. In the pre-digital age, this was often how people with literary ambitions, eccentric opinions, or obscure interests found one another and shared their work. For Lovecraft, the UAPA provided a forum, an audience, and, most importantly, a community.
It’s not hard to see the connection. To be anachronistic, the UAPA was Lovecraft’s early “platform,” while his letters became his lifelong “feed.” Both offered him a way to connect, exchange ideas, and keep writing, whether or not the commercial magazines accepted his fiction. That’s one of the reasons we know Lovecraft better than we know most of his contemporaries. His fiction reveals his artistic ideals, but his correspondence and amateur journalism reveal his mind. Just as blogs today offer insight into their authors’ lives, passions, and obsessions, so too do Lovecraft’s letters and UAPA writings.
S. T. Joshi's best estimate (which I think is the best estimate so far) is that Lovecraft wrote 87,500 substantial letters (IIRC, this excludes postcards) in his lifetime, after age 10 or so. That's an average of 8 letters a day, every day of his life, and does not include his prolific work as an amateur journalist. He loved his fountain pens, and you can see in his handwriting a knack for speed with flourish, but he also owned a typewriter since 1906 (for manuscripts) and occasionally typed his letters on that.
ReplyDeleteIn either case, I'd guess he spent an average of 30 minutes on each letter, whether handwritten or typed. assuming the average length of the surviving letters fairly represents the greater body of lost letters, so about four hours a day, every day, were spent on correspondence.
Something really interesting in Lovecraft's "blog posts" is how he carefully repeats his responses for different readers. For example, a question he personally answered many, many times is whether or not his mythology was based in reality, or if the Necronomicon was real.
ReplyDelete"As for seriously-written books on dark, occult, and supernatural themes—in all truth they don’t amount to much. That is why it’s more fun to invent mythical works like the Necronomicon and Book of Eibon." To Willis Conover (July 29, 1936)
"For the fun of building up a convincing cycle of synthetic folklore, all of our gang frequently allude to the pet daemons of the others—thus Smith uses my Yog-Sothoth, while I use his Tsathoggua. Also, I sometimes insert a devil or two of my own in the tales I revise or ghost-write for professional clients. Thus our black pantheon acquires an extensive publicity & pseudo-authoritativeness it would not otherwise get. We never, however, try to put it across as an actual hoax; but always carefully explain to enquirers that it is 100% fiction. In order to avoid ambiguity in my references to the Necronomicon I have drawn up a brief synopsis of its ‘history’... All this gives it a sort of air of verisimilitude." To William Frederick Anger (August 14, 1934)
In his post-script in the letter to Robert Barlow written that same day (six days before his birthday), he wrote "[P.S.] Just had 2 more enquiries as to the reality of the Necronomicon!"
Jim Hodges---
ReplyDeleteI've read that during his final illness HPL kept detailed notes of the disease's progress. I've never seen these, wouldn't want to, but it serves to tell us much about the man that he apparently did this.