Lovecraft was, in so many ways, like many of us who have found solace in books, in quiet contemplation, and in worlds of our own making. He was shy, intensely bookish, and at odds with the modern world and its demands, yet he also cultivated wide friendships and a network of mutual support that enriched both his life and the lives of those around him. He endured profound loss and personal difficulty throughout his life, from the death of his father while a child to the even greater loss of his beloved grandfather to a mother whose protectiveness sometimes smothered him Despite that, he carved out a life of meaning through his imagination, his letters, and his multitude of friends.
No one is without flaws and Lovecraft’s were many. But the measure of a man is not in perfection. It is in persistence, in the courage to create, to connect, and to leave something lasting by the time we depart this sublunary existence. In this, Lovecraft succeeded in ways few could. For me, he is a fellow nerd, a fellow writer, and a fellow introvert who managed to create not only stories but, just as importantly, friendships, a community, and a legacy that continues to shape the way we imagine and tell tales decades after his death.
I hope that in following The Shadow over August, readers might come to understand not just Lovecraft’s works, but the man behind them – flawed, human, brilliant, and strangely relatable. Perhaps, in some small way, I hope readers might also recognize in his life the quiet courage it takes to pursue one’s own path, to cultivate one's own circle, and to leave one's mark on the world.
Hear hear!
ReplyDeleteLovecraft was a proto-nerd, and while we've seen in our current age how that can be co-opted into or lead down ever more reactionary paths, I don't think that is the natural state of outcomes.
While he was a flawed person, and certainly shaped by his personal circumstances, I believe that he showed in his letters and his fiction at the end of his life was a start towards the kind of man who would be remembered more fondly today for coming back from those beliefs and attitudes.
That he passed away before that turn could be completed is a tragedy, but I cannot look at Shadow Out Of Time or Mountains Of Madness and not see the start of a differing relationship with the other.
"They had not been even savages—for what indeed had they done? That awful awakening in the cold of an unknown epoch—perhaps an attack by the furry, frantically barking quadrupeds, and a dazed defence against them and the equally frantic white simians with the queer wrappings and paraphernalia . . . poor Lake, poor Gedney . . . and poor Old Ones! Scientists to the last—what had they done that we would not have done in their place? God, what intelligence and persistence! What a facing of the incredible, just as those carven kinsmen and forbears had faced things only a little less incredible! *Radiates, vegetables, monstrosities, star-spawn—whatever they had been, they were men!*"
HPL was a complex person, as are we all. He, in many ways, was admirable and offered more value to society than the vast majority of humans ever will. Personally, I don't agree with some of his personal opinions, but I am not one to play thought police either or impose self-righteous priggishness on another.
ReplyDeleteFor me, actions and behaviors are more what define a person, and HPL seemed to have conducted himself in a respectable manner. As well, he seems like someone I would have enjoyed having conversations with and exchanging ideas with. That is why freedom of speech and free exchange of ideas (even objectionable ones) is so important - you have the chance of convincing someone to change their opinions through debating validity of ideas themselves.
Thank you, James, for this wonderful series. I thoroughly enjoyed it, and daresay, was even excitedly refreshing my screen at times, waiting for the next post in the series.
I've enjoyed reading the articles this month. There is no argument that the texts composed by HP Lovecraft have been influential within a genre. But I wonder why anyone would consider him a fellow spirit because he demonstrated persistence (as you put it) in clearly noxious attitudes. I find little to admire in the man. Why not simply focus on the texts rather than the person?
ReplyDeleteIt's called "tolerance". You should try it sometime.
DeleteI've been a fan of HPL since my teens, and no one can realistically deny his tremendous influence on (especially ) horror fiction, but also fantasy and sci-fi, and on RPG's. I still enjoy his fiction and his best stories are classics, and I'm not getting rid of my Arkham House editions.
ReplyDeleteBut, I'm afraid I don't see him as a person I'd care to be like or emulate. Insular, crippled by his own short-sightedness and low opinion of himself. He also probably suffered from some form of depression, I suspect. And while his racism doesn't diminish my enjoyment of his fiction, is does turn me off to him as a person. So while I share your view that he was very much a typical sci-fi and fantasy fan, and might well have been a RPG'er had such things been around at the time, I see him as an example of what not to let oneself become.
Interesting posts though and thanks for creating them.
Nobody is perfect. everyone has flaws. Stop acting self-righteous.
DeleteAgreed. We can appreciate the positive contributions of people while also holding them to criticism where it applies.
DeleteThis was beautifully said and I have nothing to add.
ReplyDeleteLovecraft is one of those fellas I love reading the comments about. I always root for the virtue-signaling, high-minded out there.
ReplyDeleteWhen I first read HPL, sure there were passages here and there that caused me to raise an eyebrow. And I thought to myself, “My how the times have changed” and maybe even chuckled at the ridiculousness of it, and then finished reading the story.
But again, to all the modernist moral pillars out there, hats off kids for toeing the line for all us dopes out here, who don’t remember to constantly proclaim how Lovecraft was a jerk! I’m looking forward to Columbus Day, I’m sure I’ll hear from you all then….
Erick, as you know, virtue-signaling is defined partly by the mental state of the person doing it.
DeleteThat is, there is no statement which could be said to be virtue-signaling, without knowing why the person said what they said.
Given this, explain how you know the people you're criticizing to be virtue-signaling.
Allow me to point out that I clearly stated I enjoyed HPL's fiction, nor refer to him as a "jerk", nor state than anyone else is a "dope".
DeleteJames -
DeleteVirtue Signaling is a proclamation of moral superiority when none is needed. A school shooting, and done guy has to state, “Shooting kids at a school is terrible!”
Yeah buddy, we know, but thanks for making your stance on it public, so we can all understand your high sense of morals.
Does anyone NEED to say that HOL’s view of say immigrants, or various ethnicities is wrong????
No, of course not. But man oh man do I get to read it every time he comes-up. The ONLY reason to do so is to signal to everyone who might read your post that you are virtuous.
It’s tired. It’s old. We get it. We’re here to discuss his writing. His literary impact on horror and fantasy. Save your virtue signalling for the girl you’re hoping to impress at the coffee shop.
List the five most prominent people who have "magnified his flaws" (a phrase which does not mean "talking about the flaws that he had which I would have preferred them to ignore"), along with examples of them doing so.
ReplyDeleteOn the image above he looks quite like Christopher Waltz.
ReplyDeleteWhile I might agree that Lovecraft had a lot in common with many of us, myself included, and with "nerds" in general, I take a slightly different lesson.
ReplyDeleteHis flaws were to my mind reprehensible, something beyond the usual human issues of drinking too much or infidelity to a partner. Beyond even using the words of his time that are no longer in favor. Sure his race science/hate were also I think the flaws of his culture, but he had them (and many did not even then) in an exaggerated way and at their ugliest. Too me this makes him a warning as well as an author of some great stories.
My own gloss is that to bookish people (for a lack of a better term), the risk here is that in living largely outside of the world - that living too much in books and games, makes us susceptible too bookish obsessions and absolutes - in Lovecraft's case this seems to have dragged a natural misanthropy or timidity into racial hatred. At a time where such horrific ideas are again becoming popular it seems important to both acknowledge this overtly and question if being an internal exile in the world of ideas and fantasy is always entirely safe and without risk or cost. We should interrogate our own fantasy I guess and perhaps hold it less closely then Lovecraft did.
Finally, I believe that Lovecraft's racial animosities damage his work, they make it ring a bit hollow and detract from the terrifying idea that there is something out beyond our shared humanity that is fundamentally inimical to us - but might also be tempting. Lovecraft wasn't willing to extend shared humanity to many people, and in this I think he lessens the impact of his ideas and the terrible implication that working for the destruction of all is tempting for no reason beyond nihilism or will to power.
Also for a great and creepy take on Lovecraft that is made with love for him, but also as a commentary on his "issues", take a look at Victor LeValle's novella "Ballad of Black Tom".
100% disagree.
DeleteFor most of human history, human beings have noted racial and ethnic differences, some peoples caring more about these differences than others. Many, many of them saw other peoples as a threat and, often, inferior.
H.P. Lovecraft is hardly unique in holding some of these opinions, and - for me at least - this in no way whatsoever diminishes his works. Instead, it simply colors it and adds context.
Judging past peoples by the mores of the current day is the laziest (and least accurate) way of looking at historical figures. Perhaps we all should be judging others less harshly for opinions held in a world we did not live in and cannot have known.
Bookoo gets it
DeleteLovecraft called Hitler a clown, married a Jew, was a socialist and believed in the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. Cases can be made for periods of xenophobia and Anglo-superiority, but "hatred" is simply libel, or, at the most generous, a hysterically false assertion.
DeleteHow would you like to be posthumously painted with "reprehensible flaw" of false witness? So...just chill. Lovecraft is no more above criticism than anyone else, but he most certainly is quite a bit above the contempt of ignorant literary "scholars" who parrot the third-hand lies that keep them in the club.
Let me take a different tack. Yes, HPL pretty much was a classic sci-fi/fantasy nerd, like most of the people who got drawn to D&D and such back in the day. But then again so were Lin Carter, and L. Sprague DeCamp, and Stephen King, and Harlan Ellison (though he'd probably have denied it).
ReplyDeleteWait, who would have denied it, Ellison or Lovecraft? Either way, I'm pretty confident not only would have both men embraced their nerdiness, but basically said as much! Ellison thought he was pretty cool, smoking the pipe and promoting himself as a professional liar, but someone who eschewed nerdiness would never have written Incredible Hulk comic books.
DeleteMy impression of Ellison (who's writing I am also a fan of), was that he considered himself cooler than the sci-fi nerds he frequently disparaged. Didn't know the man so, as I said, just an impression.
DeleteFWIW - if invited to play an RPG, I can picture Lin Carter diving in enthusiastically, King probably willing to give it a try, DeCamp would have played a session or two, then written a book on the RPG phenomena, pointing out all the things D&D got "wrong" and analyzing RPG players using outdated 30's/40's-era psychology, and Ellison would probably get pissed off at the GM mid-game and storm out. ;)
Or, possibly more likely, he would have wanted to roll up a 18th-level Axe Murderer with a Minnie Mouse Tattoo, gotten kicked out, and then later insulted Gary Gygax about his stupid rules when they met up at a video game conference years later. But if he actually trusted the DM, I think he would have played with madcap, pipesmoking abandon. The only thing that really mattered for him is if he felt comfortable.
DeleteHPL is one of a few authors whose imagination was so vivid that I can even read his early/unfinished works and enjoy it a lot. Of course, his later "Mythos" works are amazing where everything comes together. But in his earlier/unfinished work, even if the characters, plot, etc., are rough, the ideas and imagination shine through.
ReplyDeletethank you
ReplyDelete